[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Equifax hack worse than previously thought: Biz kissed goodbye to card expiry dates, tax IDs etc

[Greg Shatan]

In a similar vein, ICANN could establish an “Over-enforce the GDPR Fund,”
in which everyone who thinks the GDPR’s data blackout should be extended to
the data of non-EU and legal persons would pay in, and it would be used to
defray the expenses incurred by those who should have access to information
and instead must expend additional time, money and effort, and often incur
additional harm, due GDPR over-enforcement.

On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 5:03 AM Volker Greimann <vgreimann at key-systems.net>
wrote:

> Maybe you are hitting on something here.
>
> ICANN could just establish a "Leave-Whois-as-it-is" legal defense fund.
> Everyone who argues that whois should remain as it is has to pay into that
> fund and everyone who is fined by data protection violations can take the
> fines and their legal costs out of that fund. Of course, that would
> necessitate huge investments to set up the fund from mainly volunteer
> organizations that do not actually have the means to support it.
>
> Best,
>
> Volker
>
> Am 14.02.2018 um 02:21 schrieb Rubens Kuhl:
>
>
>
> On 13 Feb 2018, at 20:32, John Horton <john.horton at legitscript.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks, Rubens -- I don't agree with that interpretation. (I think you
> mean the Q&A memo Section 2, right?) See memo here
> <https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/gdpr-memorandum-part2-18dec17-en.pdf>.
> Let me know if you meant the first or a different one.
>
>
>
> It's exactly that memo.
> Since you don't agree, does that mean that your organisation is willing to
> pay every GDPR fine contracted parties get from following your
> interpretation ? Because if you are unwilling to do that, then your belief
> in that interpretation is not rock solid.
>
> What I can tell you is that this risk has been flagged by that paper, by
> the eco model and by internal analysis of some registries, all
> independently of each other; which means you will likely see a good number
> of contracted parties following exactly the path I outlined in order to
> mitigate this risk.
>
> If you see things differently, get Europeans DPAs to put that in writing,
> and we are all good to go.
>
>
>
> Rubens
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing listgnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.orghttps://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20180215/f3f6d43f/attachment.html>