[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Legal Inquiry to ICANN

[Paul Keating]

+1

From:  gnso-rds-pdp-wg <gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of
Stephanie Perrin <stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca>
Date:  Thursday, February 15, 2018 at 2:56 AM
To:  <gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org>, KWASNY Sophie <Sophie.KWASNY at coe.int>,
KIMPIAN Peter <Peter.KIMPIAN at coe.int>
Subject:  Re: [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Legal Inquiry to ICANN

>     
>  
> 
> I think this is an excellent suggestion.  May I add to this a suggestion that
> we include the DPAs who so kindly came to Copenhagen last year?  They
> indicated a willingness to engage further, and I see no evidence that we have
> done so.  I am sure the Council of Europe would be happy to broker this for us
> and am copying Sophie and Peter to see if we can engage them to help with this
> task.
>  
> 
> I must say I am getting very weary of this endless debate, and commend the
> patience of folks like Michael who have been witnessing it for a decade longer
> than I have. I would remind everybody that there has been no substantive
> change in the actual application of the EU laws to ICANN, except for the 4%
> fines.  Now, of course, as Bob Dylan famously said, money doesn't talk, it
> screams......
>  
> 
> Stephanie Perrin
>  
>  
> 
> 
>  
>  
> On 2018-02-14 18:01, Michael Palage wrote:
>  
>  
>>     
>>  
>> 
>> Chuck,
>>  
>>  
>>  
>> As one of the original authors to the this extraterritorial thread, I welcome
>> all the legal interpretation by both lawyers and non-lawyers in connection
>> the scope to Article 3 of the GDPR. I  think it is fair to say there is a
>> clear lack of consensus.  Therefore I would like to propose the following.
>> Allow the group to comprise a list of legal questions regarding this issue
>> and forward it to ICANN.org and ask of them the following:
>>  
>>  
>>  
>> 1. Provide the list of questions to Hamilton for a response
>> 2. Have ICANN legal provide a response to these same questions
>>  
>>  
>>  
>> The reason for Number 2 is that John Jeffrey made very clear in the last
>> webinar that he does NOT agree with all of the Hamilton analysis.  I think us
>> ICANN volunteers toiling away in the PDP coal mine are entitled/deserve an
>> answer to these questions to allow us to move forward with more productive
>> work It does the group no good for a bunch of well-intentioned individuals
>> lacking the requisite legal training to debate these issues.
>>  
>>  
>>  
>> Best regards,
>>  
>>  
>>  
>> Michael
>>  
>>  
>>   
>> _______________________________________________
>> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
>> 
gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.orghttps://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-w>>
g
>>  
>  
> _______________________________________________ gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20180215/44685f2a/attachment.html>