[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] The message to the community (was Re: Cancellation of RDS PDP WG meetings at ICANN62)

[DANIEL NANGHAKA]

We have to get a new chair then call for a meeting to agree or make a poll
to drive consensus of failure

On Fri, May 11, 2018, 7:01 AM Rubens Kuhl <rubensk at nic.br> wrote:

>
>
> >>
> >>
> >
> > It seems to me blindingly obvious that the RDS PDP has not come to a
> > successful conclusion, but that events mean that we _have_ come to a
> > conclusion.  The fact that all these other things are going on and
> > that there is all this uncertainty suggests to me that the ICANN
> > community would be better served if we simply admitted it and sent
> > them that message, loud and clear, before Panama.  There is no hope
> > whatever that anything resembling this WG is going to be reconvened to
> > solve the same problems.  We ought to state forthrightly that, at
> > least under our previous charter, we argued for two years and barely
> > made a dent in this topic.
> >
> > We failed.  We should have the courage to admit it so that the ICANN
> > community can take that into account in whatever it tries to do next.
>
>
> Even saying so would require a consensus of the WG... is there a consensus
> of the unavoidable failure in the group ? Because otherwise, the group
> might fail even to say it has failed.
>
>
> Rubens
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20180511/3149c41d/attachment.html>