[gnso-rpm-wg] FOR INFORMATION: Letter from trademark scholars and information on Deloitte Ancillary Services

[Paul Keating]

I've not yet seen any such articulated reasons.  Care to provide them?

Sent from my iPad

> On 28 Mar 2017, at 22:40, J. Scott Evans <jsevans at adobe.com> wrote:
> 
> Paul:
>  
> I think the proponents of the closed database have repeatedly articulated the benefits they see in a closed database. That is the status quo. In order to change the status quo, it is the proponents for an open system that need to articulate (persuasively) an overriding need or benefit for such a change.
>  
> J. Scott
>  
> <image001.gif>
> J. Scott Evans
> 408.536.5336 (tel)
> 345 Park Avenue, Mail Stop W11-544
> Director, Associate General Counsel
> 408.709.6162 (cell)
> San Jose, CA, 95110, USA
> Adobe. Make It an Experience.
> jsevans at adobe.com
> www.adobe.com
>  
>  
>  
>  
> From: <gnso-rpm-wg-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Paul Keating <paul at law.es>
> Date: Tuesday, March 28, 2017 at 12:21 PM
> To: Marie Pattullo <marie.pattullo at aim.be>
> Cc: "gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org" <gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org>, Michael Karanicolas <michael at law-democracy.org>
> Subject: Re: [gnso-rpm-wg] FOR INFORMATION: Letter from trademark scholars and information on Deloitte Ancillary Services
>  
> Question.
>  
> solutions for the issues and concerns that have been
> 
> mitigated by having the database be closed
>  
> Can someone please list the issues and concerns at issue here?
>  
> And, how has closing the database mitigated any of them?
> 
> Sent from my iPad
> 
> On 28 Mar 2017, at 21:07, Marie Pattullo <marie.pattullo at aim.be> wrote:
> 
> solutions for the issues and concerns that have been
> mitigated by having the database be closed
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-wg/attachments/20170328/c27217d1/attachment.html>