[gnso-rpm-wg] FOR INFORMATION: Letter from trademark scholars and information on Deloitte Ancillary Services

[Mary Wong]

Hello everyone,

If it will help, the need to maintain the confidentiality of the TMCH Database (TMDB) was discussed by the Implementation Assistance Group (IAG), working between October 2011 and May 2012 and consisting of community volunteers. The IAG was convened to develop and recommend business requirements around specific issues in the provision of Sunrise and Claims Notification services through the TMCH.

The attached document excerpts some text from the IAG’s final report that seems to indicate that the IAG considered the question as to whether and why the TMDB was to be a confidential database. Please note that staff is providing this text purely for informational purposes, and takes no position as to whether or not the TMDB should continue to remain confidential.

Cheers
Mary

From: <gnso-rpm-wg-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Paul Keating <Paul at law.es>
Date: Tuesday, March 28, 2017 at 23:08
To: "J. Scott Evans" <jsevans at adobe.com>
Cc: "gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org" <gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org>, Michael Karanicolas <michael at law-democracy.org>
Subject: Re: [gnso-rpm-wg] FOR INFORMATION: Letter from trademark scholars and information on Deloitte Ancillary Services

I've not yet seen any such articulated reasons.  Care to provide them?

Sent from my iPad

On 28 Mar 2017, at 22:40, J. Scott Evans <jsevans at adobe.com<mailto:jsevans at adobe.com>> wrote:
Paul:

I think the proponents of the closed database have repeatedly articulated the benefits they see in a closed database. That is the status quo. In order to change the status quo, it is the proponents for an open system that need to articulate (persuasively) an overriding need or benefit for such a change.

J. Scott

<image001.gif>

J. Scott Evans

408.536.5336 (tel)

345 Park Avenue, Mail Stop W11-544

Director, Associate General Counsel

408.709.6162 (cell)

San Jose, CA, 95110, USA

Adobe. Make It an Experience.

jsevans at adobe.com<mailto:jsevans at adobe.com>

www.adobe.com[adobe.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.adobe.com&d=DwMCaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=DJ69mAe-idEhpAMF1nu2x6c2w3xl7xb5cjS_7sB4h6Y&m=xzS0_a7gh_CbP93HDCn4gCiEPf61PKMba02eWelzxC0&s=QGu3yeTOdbOcCfjnVYkndyNSP8JSD3FM3-F3Icw1jYE&e=>








From: <gnso-rpm-wg-bounces at icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces at icann.org>> on behalf of Paul Keating <paul at law.es<mailto:paul at law.es>>
Date: Tuesday, March 28, 2017 at 12:21 PM
To: Marie Pattullo <marie.pattullo at aim.be<mailto:marie.pattullo at aim.be>>
Cc: "gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org>" <gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org>>, Michael Karanicolas <michael at law-democracy.org<mailto:michael at law-democracy.org>>
Subject: Re: [gnso-rpm-wg] FOR INFORMATION: Letter from trademark scholars and information on Deloitte Ancillary Services

Question.

solutions for the issues and concerns that have been


mitigated by having the database be closed

Can someone please list the issues and concerns at issue here?

And, how has closing the database mitigated any of them?

Sent from my iPad

On 28 Mar 2017, at 21:07, Marie Pattullo <marie.pattullo at aim.be<mailto:marie.pattullo at aim.be>> wrote:
solutions for the issues and concerns that have been
mitigated by having the database be closed
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-wg/attachments/20170329/9a509eea/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: TMCH IAG Input Summary Excerpt - Data Location & Access.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 139336 bytes
Desc: TMCH IAG Input Summary Excerpt - Data Location & Access.docx
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-wg/attachments/20170329/9a509eea/TMCHIAGInputSummaryExcerpt-DataLocationAccess-0001.docx>