[GNSO-RPM-WG] Comment deadline 4/27 - question

Paul Tattersfield gpmgroup at gmail.com
Sun Apr 19 17:49:48 UTC 2020


Hi Kathy,

I’m not sure extending the comment period will help much. Does anyone
really expect the majority of people to wade through pages of Google forms
to express an opinion?

I was going to comment on a couple of matters, including making sure IGOs
have access to the TMCH but even though I have a reasonable working
knowledge of the report I felt on balance it was too much of a time sink to
comment substantively.

I did try to read the other comment submitted (which now seems to have
disappeared) but I couldn’t even access any of the longer fields to read
all the text. Also I didn’t have the time to waste looking up what each
answer was in response to as the Google form only has recommendations and
question numbers so I needed to cross reference everything.

All in all, pretty abysmal to be honest.

I am curious though if it is someone trying to over engineer comment
periods or whether perhaps it’s more serious such as systemic bias leading
to complete distain for any input that might be contrary to a predetermined
outcome?

Best regards,


Paul

On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 2:45 PM Kathy Kleiman <kathy at kathykleiman.com>
wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> I hope you and your families, firms, organizations and schools are well
> and safe amidst the COVID19 challenges around the world.
>
> Our RPM WG comments are due a week from tomorrow (4/27).  This comes even
> as other comment and related deadlines are being extended (e.g., USPTO is
> allowing  documents "due between (and inclusive of) March 27, 2020, and
> April 30, 2020" to be considered timely if filed "within 30 days of the
> original due date").
>
> How has COVID18 affected the companies and organizations we were hoping to
> reach with this comment period?  How should we be considering revising
> deadlines and other filing issues, if at all, in response to the crisis?
>
> I would value your input greatly.  The RPM WG Leadership Team is meeting
> at 9am Eastern tomorrow (Mon) to discuss.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Kathy Kleiman
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> GNSO-RPM-WG mailing list
> GNSO-RPM-WG at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg
> _______________________________________________
> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your
> personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance
> with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and
> the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can
> visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or
> configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or
> disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-wg/attachments/20200419/0e3845c5/attachment.html>


More information about the GNSO-RPM-WG mailing list