[GNSO-RPM-WG] RPMs PDP WG Consensus Call: 30 Oct - 08 Nov

[Jay Chapman]

Thank you to everyone in the working group, especially Kathy, Brian & Phil,
and to Mary, Julie, and Ariel.  Except to the extent stated in the Minority
Statement related to TMCH Final Recommendation #1, I support the Final
Report.


Sincerely,
Jay Chapman

* <http://www.digimedia.com>*
102 S. Broadway, #200 - Edmond, OK 73034
jay at digimedia.com - (940) 691-1800


On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 8:52 AM Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund at icann.org>
wrote:

> Dear WG members,
>
>
>
> On behalf of the WG Co-Chairs, and as discussed during the WG meeting on
> Thursday, 29 October, this email is to notify you of the *opening of the
> online Consensus Call on the Recommendations of the Phase 1 Final Report of
> the GNSO Policy Development Process (PDP) on the Review of All Rights
> Protection Mechanisms (RPMs) in All gTLDs*.  For reference, please see
> the attached PDF of the Recommendations and contextual language. WG
> members who wish to familiarize themselves with the steps involved and the
> various levels of consensus applicable to GNSO PDP recommendations can
> refer to the recording of the 29 October meeting
> <https://community.icann.org/display/RARPMRIAGPWG/2020-10-29+Review+of+all+Rights+Protection+Mechanisms+%28RPMs%29+in+all+gTLDs+PDP+WG>
> where the Consensus Call process was described.
>
>
>
> This Consensus Call opens *today, Friday, 30 October 2020 for a 10-day
> period, closing on Sunday, 08 November 2020*.  Per the GNSO Working Group
> Guidelines
> <https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/file/field-file-attach/annex-1-gnso-wg-guidelines-24oct19-en.pdf>
> , *WG members are requested to indicate **via reply to this list* *whether
> they support, or do not support, the recommendations.*  If a WG member
> does not respond this will be taken as support.  During this period there
> will be no WG meetings.
>
>
>
> Following the close of the Consensus Call, the WG Co-Chairs will meet on
> Tuesday, 10 November to review the responses from the WG members and
> determine the Consensus Designations for the Recommendations.  The WG
> Co-Chairs will post the results of their determination to the WG email
> distribution list.  Assuming there is no disagreement by the WG with the
> Consensus Designations that may require further review of the initial
> Designations by the Co-Chairs, staff will incorporate them into the Final
> Report.
>
>
>
> Per the Work Plan, the WG must submit the Final Report to the GNSO Council
> no later than Wednesday, 25 November 2020.
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Mary, Ariel, and Julie
> _______________________________________________
> GNSO-RPM-WG mailing list
> GNSO-RPM-WG at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg
> _______________________________________________
> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your
> personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance
> with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and
> the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can
> visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or
> configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or
> disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-wg/attachments/20201108/1819ccb5/attachment.html>