[Gnso-ssc] Poll "preview" - EC Admin representative

Johan Helsingius julf at julf.com
Thu Jun 1 09:51:35 UTC 2017


Dear Emily,

Thanks for the clarification - with that, I am OK with the
poll being sent out.

	Julf

On 01-06-17 11:00, Emily Barabas wrote:
> Dear Julf,
> 
> Thanks for your question. I think in this case, for question 1, it may be easiest to select “other” and simply describe your preference as you do below. We will not be analyzing the results quantitatively. The goal is primarily to understand what different SSC members are thinking at this point. To that end, as long as your response captures your point of view, it will provide useful input for the discussion. 
> 
> Kind regards,
> Emily
> 
> On 01/06/17 10:39, "gnso-ssc-bounces at icann.org on behalf of Johan Helsingius" <gnso-ssc-bounces at icann.org on behalf of julf at julf.com> wrote:
> 
>     Dear Emily,
>     
>     I am not sure how to handle the interaction of questions 1
>     and 2.
>     
>     In question 1 we address the GNSO chair, and the questions
>     assume he/she is either first choice or the alternative
>     choice - but in question 2 there is the possibility of the
>     rep being selected from current council leadership - so the
>     chair is one possibility, but not the only one.
>     
>     In this case, should one answer "yes" to both choices in
>     question 1?
>     
>     Would it be clearer to add a possibility of "the chair is
>     not special" on question 1?
>     
>     	Julf
>     
>     On 01-06-17 10:24, Emily Barabas wrote:
>     > Dear SSC members,
>     > 
>     >  
>     > 
>     > As discussed yesterday, we will be opening a poll on some of the key
>     > questions the SSC is considering related to the EC Admin representative.
>     > Over the last two meetings, we have received input from Sam Eisner &
>     > Trang Nguyen (ICANN org) and James Bladel (GNSO Council Chair and
>     > interim rep) to support development of the selection process. 
>     > 
>     >  
>     > 
>     > The purpose of this poll is to get a sense of the direction of travel
>     > from the group and see if agreement is beginning to form on key
>     > questions related to this selection process.
>     > 
>     >  
>     > 
>     > The poll is currently in “preview” mode so that you can review the
>     > questions:
>     > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.surveymonkey.com_r_Preview_-3Fsm-3D0kmHUwrR8LPXqqz64zxwbFIsitOE7P4MFUBIQjaXUvv9SoIzow75Is7gYJASBrUU&d=DwIGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=mBQzlSaM6eYCHFBU-v48zs-QSrjHB0aWmHuE4X4drzI&m=cTipEqgvZBLiPH-bZPcgDYGXMDwdcXRvlbL-d0rCLRk&s=fhEYoNdRPWEybKzP91kj0tThs1SfbQJGiu1j4ctoK3w&e= .
>     > If you enter a response at this point, it will not be recorded. *If you
>     > have any feedback on the questions or survey structure, please send
>     > comments by 8:00 UTC tomorrow. *Staff will then incorporate any feedback
>     > and open the poll. **
>     > 
>     >  
>     > 
>     > Note that an updated working document with questions and discussion
>     > points is attached for reference.
>     > 
>     >  
>     > 
>     > Kind regards,
>     > 
>     > Emily
>     > 
>     >  
>     > 
>     > *Emily Barabas *| Policy Specialist
>     > 
>     > *ICANN*| Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers
>     > 
>     > Email: emily.barabas at icann.org | Phone: +31 (0)6 84507976
>     > 
>     >  
>     > 
>     > 
>     > 
>     > _______________________________________________
>     > Gnso-ssc mailing list
>     > Gnso-ssc at icann.org
>     > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc
>     > 
>     
>     _______________________________________________
>     Gnso-ssc mailing list
>     Gnso-ssc at icann.org
>     https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc
> 



More information about the Gnso-ssc mailing list