[Gnso-ssc] Poll "preview" - EC Admin representative

[Emily Barabas]

Dear Julf,

Thanks for your question. I think in this case, for question 1, it may be easiest to select “other” and simply describe your preference as you do below. We will not be analyzing the results quantitatively. The goal is primarily to understand what different SSC members are thinking at this point. To that end, as long as your response captures your point of view, it will provide useful input for the discussion. 

Kind regards,
Emily

On 01/06/17 10:39, "gnso-ssc-bounces at icann.org on behalf of Johan Helsingius" <gnso-ssc-bounces at icann.org on behalf of julf at julf.com> wrote:

    Dear Emily,
    
    I am not sure how to handle the interaction of questions 1
    and 2.
    
    In question 1 we address the GNSO chair, and the questions
    assume he/she is either first choice or the alternative
    choice - but in question 2 there is the possibility of the
    rep being selected from current council leadership - so the
    chair is one possibility, but not the only one.
    
    In this case, should one answer "yes" to both choices in
    question 1?
    
    Would it be clearer to add a possibility of "the chair is
    not special" on question 1?
    
    	Julf
    
    On 01-06-17 10:24, Emily Barabas wrote:
    > Dear SSC members,
    > 
    >  
    > 
    > As discussed yesterday, we will be opening a poll on some of the key
    > questions the SSC is considering related to the EC Admin representative.
    > Over the last two meetings, we have received input from Sam Eisner &
    > Trang Nguyen (ICANN org) and James Bladel (GNSO Council Chair and
    > interim rep) to support development of the selection process. 
    > 
    >  
    > 
    > The purpose of this poll is to get a sense of the direction of travel
    > from the group and see if agreement is beginning to form on key
    > questions related to this selection process.
    > 
    >  
    > 
    > The poll is currently in “preview” mode so that you can review the
    > questions:
    > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.surveymonkey.com_r_Preview_-3Fsm-3D0kmHUwrR8LPXqqz64zxwbFIsitOE7P4MFUBIQjaXUvv9SoIzow75Is7gYJASBrUU&d=DwIGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=mBQzlSaM6eYCHFBU-v48zs-QSrjHB0aWmHuE4X4drzI&m=cTipEqgvZBLiPH-bZPcgDYGXMDwdcXRvlbL-d0rCLRk&s=fhEYoNdRPWEybKzP91kj0tThs1SfbQJGiu1j4ctoK3w&e= .
    > If you enter a response at this point, it will not be recorded. *If you
    > have any feedback on the questions or survey structure, please send
    > comments by 8:00 UTC tomorrow. *Staff will then incorporate any feedback
    > and open the poll. **
    > 
    >  
    > 
    > Note that an updated working document with questions and discussion
    > points is attached for reference.
    > 
    >  
    > 
    > Kind regards,
    > 
    > Emily
    > 
    >  
    > 
    > *Emily Barabas *| Policy Specialist
    > 
    > *ICANN*| Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers
    > 
    > Email: emily.barabas at icann.org | Phone: +31 (0)6 84507976
    > 
    >  
    > 
    > 
    > 
    > _______________________________________________
    > Gnso-ssc mailing list
    > Gnso-ssc at icann.org
    > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc
    > 
    
    _______________________________________________
    Gnso-ssc mailing list
    Gnso-ssc at icann.org
    https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc