[Gnso-ssc] Development of process and criteria for selection of GNSO Rep to EC Admin

[Maxim Alzoba]

Hello Julf, 

I do support your point of view.

If the only reason for co-chair position is a possibility to replace Chair
in case of PTO or illness (time conflicts in our meetings can be resolved, due to rather small number of seats), 
then 2 co-chairs is definitely an overkill, and I think that only one is enough.

Ultimately we can vote via poll for 1 question : 2 Co-chairs - is it a must for our Committee?
(and next poll (depends on result of the first) - Whom do you support for A Co-Chair position? (for TWO Co-Chairs positions)

P.s: I believe that in our case co-chair's position is quite formal and needed only for formal 
leading of the discussion during the calls (or on the list in case of Chair's PTO/sickness leave).


Sincerely Yours,

Maxim Alzoba
Special projects manager,
International Relations Department,
FAITID

m. +7 916 6761580(+whatsapp)
skype oldfrogger

Current UTC offset: +3.00 (.Moscow)

> On May 15, 2017, at 10:27, Johan Helsingius <julf at julf.com> wrote:
> 
> (Apologies for late reply, as I was pretty busy at RIPE74)
> 
> Renata, Poncelet,
> 
> Thank you for the kind and encouraging words.
> 
> My only concern is that chair + 2 vice chairs for a group
> as small as ours might be a bit of overkill.
> 
> 	Julf
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-ssc mailing list
> Gnso-ssc at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc