[Gnso-ssc] Notes, action items & consensus call

[Renata Aquino Ribeiro]

Thank for the notes

I support the results


Em 5 de out de 2017 5:01 PM, "Marika Konings" <marika.konings at icann.org>
escreveu:

Dear All,



Please find below the notes and action items from today’s meeting. *For
those not on the call today, please indicate by Monday 9 October COB
whether you support or do not support the proposed ranking of the
candidates for the GNSO Liaison to the GAC role, namely: 1) Julf, 2)
Osvaldo, 3) Paul.*



Thanks,



Marika



*Notes from SSC meeting on 5 October 2017*



1. Roll Call/SOI

2. Review survey results

   - See survey results circulated via email (https://www.surveymonkey.com/
   results/SM-KZRSQJD78/)
   - Julf came out as the lead candidates on all questions, with Osvaldo in
   second place and Paul in third.
   - All but two SSC members filled out the survey.
   - Julf is also endorsed by RrSG, BC, RySG and NCSG
   - IPC is very supportive of Paul Rosenzweig as a candidate - might be
   worth thinking outside of the traditional gammit of candidates? This is not
   a role that may be suitable for newcomers. For other types of appointments
   it is definitely important to encourage newcomers.
   - Important to take into account the objective of this role: The GNSO
   liaison to the GAC (hereafter “the Liaison”) will be primarily responsible
   for providing timely updates to the GAC on GNSO policy development
   activities in order to complement the existing notification processes as
   well answering questions in relation to these (GNSO) activities that GAC
   members may have. Furthermore, the Liaison will be responsible for
   providing the GNSO Council with regular updates on progress, including on
   GAC activities, specifically in so far as these relate to issues of
   interest to the GNSO. The objective of the liaison mechanism, in
   combination with some of the other mechanisms that the CG is exploring, as
   well as existing early engagement tools, will be to facilitate effective
   early engagement of the GAC as well as generally assist with flow of
   information between the GAC and the GNSO. In addition to these existing
   engagement tools, regular co-ordination calls are to be scheduled between
   the GNSO Liaison to the GAC and the GAC Secretariat to ascertain that all
   the relevant information has been received by the GAC and progress is being
   made, following which a regular status update is provided by the Liaison to
   the GNSO Council.
   - Three good candidates, but level of support is different.
   - Lori to consult with IPC factoring input and discussions today, but
   also consider how close nr 1 and 2 are. Are people wedded to Julf or is
   there also willingness to consider #2 candidate?
   - Considering asking those that haven’t completed the poll yet to do so
   now, but it may bias the responses?
   - Also note the timeline as outlined in the call for volunteers: The SSC
   will review the applications received and rank these taking into account
   the skills and experience required as outlined in this call for volunteers
   by 6 October 2016; Based on the outcome of the ranking process, the SSC
   will contact the nr 1 candidate to confirm the proposed selection by 11
   October 2016 and confirm that the candidate is still available; the SSC
   will submit its recommendation to the GNSO Council in the form of a motion
   for confirmation of GNSO Liaison to the GAC to the GNSO Council by 16
   October 2017 at the latest. There may be some flexibility here but the
   ‘final’ deadline is the motion and document deadline for ICANN60 which is
   16 October 2017.
   - Staff to prepare draft motion for SSC consideration. Motion to include
   appreciation and recognition for the 3 very good candidates.
   - IPC support the rankings and do not object to Julf and is very pleased
   that their concerns are noted and will be considered for future positions.
   - Consider for future selection processes whether to interview the
   candidates.
   - All those on the call supported the ranking as resulting from the poll
   (1. Julf, 2. Osvaldo, 3. Paul).



*Action item #1*: Staff to prepare draft motion for SSC review (name of
proposed candidate to be filled out once agreement has been received)



*Action item #2*: Staff to share results from the call with the mailing
list and request those that were not able to attend whether they have any
objections to the proposed ranking (1. Julf, 2. Osvaldo, 3. Paul). Deadline
for feedback is Monday 9 October (23:59 US time).



*Marika Konings*

*Vice President, Policy Development Support – GNSO, Internet Corporation
for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) *

*Email: marika.konings at icann.org <marika.konings at icann.org>  *



*Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO*

*Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses
<http://learn.icann.org/courses/gnso> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages
<http://gnso.icann.org/sites/gnso.icann.org/files/gnso/presentations/policy-efforts.htm#newcomers>.
*



_______________________________________________
Gnso-ssc mailing list
Gnso-ssc at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-ssc/attachments/20171005/fc0bbbb3/attachment-0001.html>