[Gnso-subteam0b-policyimpl] For final review - revised working principles document

[Nic Steinbach]

Hi Chuck,

I had a suggestion in that first email, but here is another suggestion that
I think makes it a little more concrete.

"The development and implementation of policy must have a basis in and
adhere to standards of fairness, notice, transparency, integrity,
objectivity, predictability and due process consistent with ICANN's core
values [link to values]."

Quite a mouthful, but it is a pretty straightforward approach to capturing
all of the descriptors in both of the sentences. I also didn't want to have
the word "principle" in a principle.

As you said I would roll it into section B.

What do you (and others) think?

-Nic


On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 1:30 PM, Gomes, Chuck <cgomes at verisign.com> wrote:

>  I like this Nic.  I wondered if that is what you meant.  What language
> would you suggest?
>
>
>
> Chuck
>
>
>
> *From:* Nic Steinbach [mailto:nic at name.com]
> *Sent:* Monday, February 24, 2014 11:17 AM
>
> *To:* Gomes, Chuck
> *Cc:* Marika Konings; gnso-subteam0b-policyimpl at icann.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Gnso-subteam0b-policyimpl] For final review - revised
> working principles document
>
>
>
> "My preference is to roll them together into section C. "
>
>
>
> I apologize. Should be:
>
>
>
> "My preference is to roll them together into a bullet point in section B."
>
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 9:16 AM, Nic Steinbach <nic at name.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Chuck,
>
>
>
> I think that while these provisions contain similar language, in context
> they seem to be referring to different principles.
>
>
>
> C. 1.) b) - Seems to be referring to the *development of policy*.
>
>
>
> The "development should be based on principles of fairness, notice,
> transparency and due process as well as predictability."
>
>
>
> D. 1.) c.) - Seems to be referring to the *application of policy*.
>
>
>
> "Applying documented policies neutrally and objectively, with integrity
> and fairness."
>
>
>
> I don't think that these are duplicates, although we may want to make sure
> that D.1.) c.) makes reference to implementation explicitly instead of
> "applying documented policies."
>
>
>
> Alternatively we could roll both of these provisions into section B
> (Principles that apply to policy and implementation) and remove them from
> C. and D.
>
>
>
> Something like:
>
>
>
> "Policy development and implementation should be based on and adhere to
> principles of fairness, notice, transparency, integrity, objectivity,
> predictability and due process."
>
>
>
> My preference is to roll them together into section C.
>
>
>
> Best,
>
>
>
> Nic
>
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 7:38 AM, Gomes, Chuck <cgomes at verisign.com> wrote:
>
>   Sorry about forgetting to attach the file.  Here it is.
>
>
>
> Chuck
>
>
>
> *From:* Gomes, Chuck
> *Sent:* Sunday, February 23, 2014 8:21 PM
> *To:* 'Marika Konings'; 'gnso-subteam0b-policyimpl at icann.org'
> *Subject:* RE: [Gnso-subteam0b-policyimpl] For final review - revised
> working principles document
>
>
>
> You guys did great work last Thursday.  The principles document looks very
> good and the organization of it seems very clear and logical to me.  Other
> than one think that is repeated as shown with two comments in the attached
> file, it looks very close to being  ready to send to the full WG.  I am
> assuming that our agenda for our call this coming Thursday will be to make
> any final tweaks, after which we would send it to the full WG so that they
> can review it before the WG call on 5 March.  Is that correct?
>
>
>
> What is the thinking with regard to the Notes to Pass Back to the WG?  Is
> the assumption that we do not need to develop any principles for these
> items?  What expectations for the WG are there?
>
>
>
> Chuck
>
>
>
> *From:* gnso-subteam0b-policyimpl-bounces at icann.org
> [mailto:gnso-subteam0b-policyimpl-bounces at icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Marika
> Konings
> *Sent:* Thursday, February 20, 2014 5:27 PM
> *To:* gnso-subteam0b-policyimpl at icann.org
> *Subject:* [Gnso-subteam0b-policyimpl] For final review - revised working
> principles document
>
>
>
> Dear All,
>
>
>
> Following our call today, please find attached the revised version of the
> working principles document, both in redline (capturing the changes of
> today's meeting) as well as a clean version (with a separate annex covering
> 'notes to the WG'). As those sub-team members that were on the call are of
> the view that this is now ready for submission to the full WG, you are
> encouraged to let the mailing list know if you disagree with this
> assessment and/or share any additional edits / comments you may have.
>
>
>
> If no substantive comments are received *by Wednesday 26 March*, the
> proposed working principles will be submitted to the full WG for review and
> discussion at its next meeting on 5 March.
>
>
>
> Thanks for all your hard work!
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
>
>
> Marika
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-subteam0b-policyimpl mailing list
> Gnso-subteam0b-policyimpl at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-subteam0b-policyimpl
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> *Nic Steinbach*
>
> Strategic Relationship Manager
>
> 209.681.7838
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> *Nic Steinbach*
>
> Strategic Relationship Manager
>
> 209.681.7838
>
>


-- 
*Nic Steinbach*
Strategic Relationship Manager
209.681.7838
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-subteam0b-policyimpl/attachments/20140224/6e0c5ee6/attachment.html>