[Gnso-subteam0b-policyimpl] For final review - revised working principles document

Gomes, Chuck cgomes at verisign.com
Mon Feb 24 20:30:59 UTC 2014


I like this Nic.  I wondered if that is what you meant.  What language would you suggest?

Chuck

From: Nic Steinbach [mailto:nic at name.com]
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2014 11:17 AM
To: Gomes, Chuck
Cc: Marika Konings; gnso-subteam0b-policyimpl at icann.org
Subject: Re: [Gnso-subteam0b-policyimpl] For final review - revised working principles document

"My preference is to roll them together into section C. "

I apologize. Should be:

"My preference is to roll them together into a bullet point in section B."

On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 9:16 AM, Nic Steinbach <nic at name.com<mailto:nic at name.com>> wrote:
Hi Chuck,

I think that while these provisions contain similar language, in context they seem to be referring to different principles.

C. 1.) b) - Seems to be referring to the development of policy.

The "development should be based on principles of fairness, notice, transparency and due process as well as predictability."

D. 1.) c.) - Seems to be referring to the application of policy.

"Applying documented policies neutrally and objectively, with integrity and fairness."

I don't think that these are duplicates, although we may want to make sure that D.1.) c.) makes reference to implementation explicitly instead of "applying documented policies."

Alternatively we could roll both of these provisions into section B (Principles that apply to policy and implementation) and remove them from C. and D.

Something like:

"Policy development and implementation should be based on and adhere to principles of fairness, notice, transparency, integrity, objectivity, predictability and due process."

My preference is to roll them together into section C.

Best,

Nic

On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 7:38 AM, Gomes, Chuck <cgomes at verisign.com<mailto:cgomes at verisign.com>> wrote:
Sorry about forgetting to attach the file.  Here it is.

Chuck

From: Gomes, Chuck
Sent: Sunday, February 23, 2014 8:21 PM
To: 'Marika Konings'; 'gnso-subteam0b-policyimpl at icann.org<mailto:gnso-subteam0b-policyimpl at icann.org>'
Subject: RE: [Gnso-subteam0b-policyimpl] For final review - revised working principles document

You guys did great work last Thursday.  The principles document looks very good and the organization of it seems very clear and logical to me.  Other than one think that is repeated as shown with two comments in the attached file, it looks very close to being  ready to send to the full WG.  I am assuming that our agenda for our call this coming Thursday will be to make any final tweaks, after which we would send it to the full WG so that they can review it before the WG call on 5 March.  Is that correct?

What is the thinking with regard to the Notes to Pass Back to the WG?  Is the assumption that we do not need to develop any principles for these items?  What expectations for the WG are there?

Chuck

From: gnso-subteam0b-policyimpl-bounces at icann.org<mailto:gnso-subteam0b-policyimpl-bounces at icann.org> [mailto:gnso-subteam0b-policyimpl-bounces at icann.org]<mailto:[mailto:gnso-subteam0b-policyimpl-bounces at icann.org]> On Behalf Of Marika Konings
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2014 5:27 PM
To: gnso-subteam0b-policyimpl at icann.org<mailto:gnso-subteam0b-policyimpl at icann.org>
Subject: [Gnso-subteam0b-policyimpl] For final review - revised working principles document

Dear All,

Following our call today, please find attached the revised version of the working principles document, both in redline (capturing the changes of today's meeting) as well as a clean version (with a separate annex covering 'notes to the WG'). As those sub-team members that were on the call are of the view that this is now ready for submission to the full WG, you are encouraged to let the mailing list know if you disagree with this assessment and/or share any additional edits / comments you may have.

If no substantive comments are received by Wednesday 26 March, the proposed working principles will be submitted to the full WG for review and discussion at its next meeting on 5 March.

Thanks for all your hard work!

Best regards,

Marika

_______________________________________________
Gnso-subteam0b-policyimpl mailing list
Gnso-subteam0b-policyimpl at icann.org<mailto:Gnso-subteam0b-policyimpl at icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-subteam0b-policyimpl



--
Nic Steinbach
Strategic Relationship Manager
209.681.7838<tel:209.681.7838>
[http://name.com/images/email-signature-logo1.jpg]



--
Nic Steinbach
Strategic Relationship Manager
209.681.7838
[http://name.com/images/email-signature-logo1.jpg]
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-subteam0b-policyimpl/attachments/20140224/25f7d50d/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Gnso-subteam0b-policyimpl mailing list