[Gnso-subteam0b-policyimpl] For final review - revised working principles document

[Nic Steinbach]

"My preference is to roll them together into section C. "

I apologize. Should be:

"My preference is to roll them together into a bullet point in section B."


On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 9:16 AM, Nic Steinbach <nic at name.com> wrote:

> Hi Chuck,
>
> I think that while these provisions contain similar language, in context
> they seem to be referring to different principles.
>
> C. 1.) b) - Seems to be referring to the *development of policy*.
>
> The "development should be based on principles of fairness, notice,
> transparency and due process as well as predictability."
>
> D. 1.) c.) - Seems to be referring to the *application of policy*.
>
> "Applying documented policies neutrally and objectively, with integrity
> and fairness."
>
> I don't think that these are duplicates, although we may want to make sure
> that D.1.) c.) makes reference to implementation explicitly instead of
> "applying documented policies."
>
> Alternatively we could roll both of these provisions into section B
> (Principles that apply to policy and implementation) and remove them from
> C. and D.
>
> Something like:
>
> "Policy development and implementation should be based on and adhere to
> principles of fairness, notice, transparency, integrity, objectivity,
> predictability and due process."
>
> My preference is to roll them together into section C.
>
> Best,
>
> Nic
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 7:38 AM, Gomes, Chuck <cgomes at verisign.com> wrote:
>
>>  Sorry about forgetting to attach the file.  Here it is.
>>
>>
>>
>> Chuck
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Gomes, Chuck
>> *Sent:* Sunday, February 23, 2014 8:21 PM
>> *To:* 'Marika Konings'; 'gnso-subteam0b-policyimpl at icann.org'
>> *Subject:* RE: [Gnso-subteam0b-policyimpl] For final review - revised
>> working principles document
>>
>>
>>
>> You guys did great work last Thursday.  The principles document looks
>> very good and the organization of it seems very clear and logical to me.
>> Other than one think that is repeated as shown with two comments in the
>> attached file, it looks very close to being  ready to send to the full WG.
>> I am assuming that our agenda for our call this coming Thursday will be to
>> make any final tweaks, after which we would send it to the full WG so that
>> they can review it before the WG call on 5 March.  Is that correct?
>>
>>
>>
>> What is the thinking with regard to the Notes to Pass Back to the WG?  Is
>> the assumption that we do not need to develop any principles for these
>> items?  What expectations for the WG are there?
>>
>>
>>
>> Chuck
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* gnso-subteam0b-policyimpl-bounces at icann.org
>> [mailto:gnso-subteam0b-policyimpl-bounces at icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Marika
>> Konings
>> *Sent:* Thursday, February 20, 2014 5:27 PM
>> *To:* gnso-subteam0b-policyimpl at icann.org
>> *Subject:* [Gnso-subteam0b-policyimpl] For final review - revised
>> working principles document
>>
>>
>>
>> Dear All,
>>
>>
>>
>> Following our call today, please find attached the revised version of the
>> working principles document, both in redline (capturing the changes of
>> today's meeting) as well as a clean version (with a separate annex covering
>> 'notes to the WG'). As those sub-team members that were on the call are of
>> the view that this is now ready for submission to the full WG, you are
>> encouraged to let the mailing list know if you disagree with this
>> assessment and/or share any additional edits / comments you may have.
>>
>>
>>
>> If no substantive comments are received *by Wednesday 26 March*, the
>> proposed working principles will be submitted to the full WG for review and
>> discussion at its next meeting on 5 March.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks for all your hard work!
>>
>>
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>>
>>
>> Marika
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gnso-subteam0b-policyimpl mailing list
>> Gnso-subteam0b-policyimpl at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-subteam0b-policyimpl
>>
>
>
>
> --
> *Nic Steinbach*
> Strategic Relationship Manager
> 209.681.7838
>



-- 
*Nic Steinbach*
Strategic Relationship Manager
209.681.7838
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-subteam0b-policyimpl/attachments/20140224/f30e10ae/attachment-0001.html>