[GNSO-TPR] Registrar charging fees given out the TAC and transfer-out

farzaneh badii farzaneh.badii at gmail.com
Fri Mar 4 15:32:15 UTC 2022


Charging a hefty fee for transfer is not acceptable. Does the TPR at the
moment mention that transfer must take place for free and without charging
a fee? If not  we should discuss it.

On Fri, Mar 4, 2022 at 10:12 AM DANIEL NANGHAKA <dndannang at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Steinar,
>
> I strongly support this issue to be discussed as it affects end
> users directly. The policy should aim at standardization and improving the
> Domain transfer process.
>
> Thanks
> Daniel
>>
> On Fri, 4 Mar 2022 at 16:25, Steinar Grøtterød <steinar at recito.no> wrote:
>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> I have recently been informed that some registrars charge a fee for
>> issuing a TAC to the Registered Name Holder. The examples given to me is a
>> fee of USD 250(!) for sending a TAC to the RNH.
>>
>> I have also been given examples of registrar charging for accepting a
>> transfer out, purely for the «job» that has to be done.
>>
>> My question is whether this (IMHO) unfriendly practices should be
>> discussed in our working group and (maybe) incorporated in the new
>> Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Steinar Grøtterød
>> At-Large
>> _______________________________________________
>> GNSO-TPR mailing list
>> GNSO-TPR at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-tpr
>
> _______________________________________________
> GNSO-TPR mailing list
> GNSO-TPR at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-tpr

-- 
Farzaneh
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-tpr/attachments/20220304/5d4a4aa4/attachment.html>


More information about the GNSO-TPR mailing list