[GNSO-TPR] Registrar charging fees given out the TAC and transfer-out

[Wisdom Donkor]

+1 Farzaneh

On Fri, 4 Mar 2022, 3:32 pm farzaneh badii, <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Charging a hefty fee for transfer is not acceptable. Does the TPR at the
> moment mention that transfer must take place for free and without charging
> a fee? If not  we should discuss it.
>
> On Fri, Mar 4, 2022 at 10:12 AM DANIEL NANGHAKA <dndannang at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Steinar,
>>
>> I strongly support this issue to be discussed as it affects end
>> users directly. The policy should aim at standardization and improving the
>> Domain transfer process.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Daniel
>> ᐧ
>>
>> On Fri, 4 Mar 2022 at 16:25, Steinar Grøtterød <steinar at recito.no> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>> I have recently been informed that some registrars charge a fee for
>>> issuing a TAC to the Registered Name Holder. The examples given to me is a
>>> fee of USD 250(!) for sending a TAC to the RNH.
>>>
>>> I have also been given examples of registrar charging for accepting a
>>> transfer out, purely for the «job» that has to be done.
>>>
>>> My question is whether this (IMHO) unfriendly practices should be
>>> discussed in our working group and (maybe) incorporated in the new
>>> Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Steinar Grøtterød
>>> At-Large
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> GNSO-TPR mailing list
>>> GNSO-TPR at icann.org
>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-tpr
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> GNSO-TPR mailing list
>> GNSO-TPR at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-tpr
>
> --
> Farzaneh
> _______________________________________________
> GNSO-TPR mailing list
> GNSO-TPR at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-tpr
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-tpr/attachments/20220305/3af73ee6/attachment.html>