[GNSO-TPR] Registrar charging fees given out the TAC and transfer-out
Owen Smigelski
owen.smigelski at namecheap.com
Sat Mar 5 00:47:36 UTC 2022
Hi all,
Just wanted to give a little background/context for this.
While a registrar may charge a fee for a transfer, they are not allowed to block the transfer:
9. My registrar is charging me a fee to transfer to a new registrar. Is this allowed?
Yes. Registrars are allowed to set their own prices for this service so some may choose to charge a fee. However, a transfer cannot be denied due to non-payment of this transfer fee. There are other reasons your registrar can deny transfer request.
https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/name-holder-faqs-2017-10-10-en <https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/name-holder-faqs-2017-10-10-en>
I do not think many registrars do this, and it is likely generally when tied to other services (e.g. hosting or as part of brand protection). I recall at least one case when I was at ICANN Compliance where Compliance required the registrar to transfer the domain name even though the transfer out fee was not paid (it even resulted in a notice of breach).
Regards,
Owen
> On Mar 4, 2022, at 16:35, Wisdom Donkor <wisdom.dk at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +1 Farzaneh
>
> On Fri, 4 Mar 2022, 3:32 pm farzaneh badii, <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com <mailto:farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>> wrote:
> Charging a hefty fee for transfer is not acceptable. Does the TPR at the moment mention that transfer must take place for free and without charging a fee? If not we should discuss it.
>
> On Fri, Mar 4, 2022 at 10:12 AM DANIEL NANGHAKA <dndannang at gmail.com <mailto:dndannang at gmail.com>> wrote:
> Hi Steinar,
>
> I strongly support this issue to be discussed as it affects end users directly. The policy should aim at standardization and improving the Domain transfer process.
>
> Thanks
> Daniel
> ᐧ
>
> On Fri, 4 Mar 2022 at 16:25, Steinar Grøtterød <steinar at recito.no <mailto:steinar at recito.no>> wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I have recently been informed that some registrars charge a fee for issuing a TAC to the Registered Name Holder. The examples given to me is a fee of USD 250(!) for sending a TAC to the RNH.
>
> I have also been given examples of registrar charging for accepting a transfer out, purely for the «job» that has to be done.
>
> My question is whether this (IMHO) unfriendly practices should be discussed in our working group and (maybe) incorporated in the new Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy.
>
> Regards,
>
> Steinar Grøtterød
> At-Large
> _______________________________________________
> GNSO-TPR mailing list
> GNSO-TPR at icann.org <mailto:GNSO-TPR at icann.org>
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-tpr <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-tpr>_______________________________________________
> GNSO-TPR mailing list
> GNSO-TPR at icann.org <mailto:GNSO-TPR at icann.org>
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-tpr <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-tpr>--
> Farzaneh
> _______________________________________________
> GNSO-TPR mailing list
> GNSO-TPR at icann.org <mailto:GNSO-TPR at icann.org>
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-tpr <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-tpr>_______________________________________________
> GNSO-TPR mailing list
> GNSO-TPR at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-tpr
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-tpr/attachments/20220304/8ccdf70f/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the GNSO-TPR
mailing list