[GNSO-TPR] For Review: Latest Redline of Phase 1A Initial Report & Recommendations

[Mike Rodenbaugh]

Thanks Emily.  I have one hopefully quick question.  Is IANA ID defined
anywhere in the Policy?  Does it include the name of the Gaining Registrar
rather than merely a number that few people would understand?

[image: Logo]

Mike Rodenbaugh

address:

548 Market Street, Box 55819

San Francisco, CA 94104

email:

mike at rodenbaugh.com

phone:

+1 (415) 738-8087


On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 7:43 AM Emily Barabas <emily.barabas at icann.org>
wrote:

> Dear working group members,
>
>
>
> As discussed on our recent calls, staff had an action item to provide an
> updated redline revision of the Phase 1A Initial Report to the working
> group for review. The updated redline is attached and includes:
>
>
>
>    - New edits supported by the working group after reviewing public
>    comments and considering small group outputs.
>    - Updated responses to charter questions and rationales to more fully
>    provide context and reasoning for the WG’s recommendations.
>    - Updates for consistency in terminology, the way that timeframes are
>    referenced, etc.
>    - Discussion of items that the NCSG and SSAC asked the working group
>    to consider, but that the working group determined were out of scope.
>
>
>
> *Please make sure to review the following*, *with a particular focus on **edits
> that are new since the 21 December redline. New edits are **highlighted
> in yellow.*
>
>    - *Section 3 of the report (pages 11-50) *
>    - *Annex D (pages 58-63)*
>
> Highlights in blue are to assist staff in tracking areas of the report
> that will need to updated in the future. Working group members can ignore
> these highlights for now.
>
>
>
> Please carefully review this document in coordination with the groups you
> represent. If you feel that there are items that need to be revised, *please
> enter them here
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1eRM4mFGDNYhb0tiD5V_PE4zxnIKfD46esX6EtHeOnEw/edit>.
> *For each item, please include:
>
>
>
>    - Report version (the date listed in the header of the document) and
>    applicable line numbers ( these are listed along the left margin of the
>    document).
>    - Name and group you represent: If multiple WG members represent a
>    group, input should be in coordination with these other members.
>    - Rationale: please provide a clear explanation for why you are
>    proposing the revision.
>    - Specific proposed revision: Provide the language you would like to
>    see added/removed/edited.
>
>
>
> *The inputs will be reviewed when the working group returns to considering
> Phase 1(a) items. Additional information about the timeline for returning
> to Phase 1(a) will be provided as we progress through discussion of Phase 2
> topics. *
>
>
>
> Please do not hesitate to reach out with any questions about the review
> process.
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
>
>
>  Caitlin, Julie, Berry, and Emily
>
>
>
>
>
> Emily Barabas
>
> Policy Development Support Senior Manager
>
> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
>
> Phone: +31 (0)6 84507976
>
> www.icann.org
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> GNSO-TPR mailing list
> GNSO-TPR at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-tpr
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-tpr/attachments/20230215/3fd3b5e3/attachment.html>