[gtld-tech] gtld-tech URS technical requeriments
Jeff.Neuman at neustar.us
Mon Jul 8 22:34:37 UTC 2013
Let me ask the dumb question....do we really need a set of standard specs for this for a registry?
----- Original Message -----
From: John R. Levine [mailto:johnl at iecc.com]
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2013 06:29 PM
To: Gustavo Lozano <gustavo.lozano at icann.org>
Cc: gtld-tech at icann.org <gtld-tech at icann.org>
Subject: Re: [gtld-tech] gtld-tech URS technical requeriments
> Please provide your feedback no later than Tuesday 23 of July.
Thanks for publishing this.
Unfortunately, the "URS Lock with Redirection" spec is a security disaster
for e-mail, pariticularly since, as I understand it, a typical use for the
URS will be to deal with typosquats of famous names such as páypàl.tld.
Do we just send comments to you or is there a more formal place? I
expect that several anti-abuse organizations will want to weigh in.
More information about the gtld-tech