[gtld-tech] gtld-tech URS technical requeriments

[Matthias Pfeifer]

John,


> Betreff: Re: [gtld-tech] gtld-tech URS technical requeriments
> 
> > ICANN should not be mandating that any of this be done in an automated
> > fashion, nor should it mandate things like "all e-mails sent by
> > Registry Operator to the URD Provider MUST be cryptographically signed
> > using a S/MIME certificate....."
> 
> What are you going to do when sleazy domainers start phishing you with
fake
> messages from URS providers saying to turn their domains back on?
> 
> While I agree that it's silly to try and define all of the low level
details, I don't
> think it's silly to give some thought to security issues like how the URS
> providers and registries recognize each other.

almost a serious question.

What about a PKI/Web-Of-Trust, managed by the URS provider instead of
S/MIME?

But at least I think it is too complex to manage and may delay the URS
implementation/process.


Matthias Pfeifer - dotVersicherung