[gtld-tech] IANA ID for "internal" registrar
info at freshmail.de
Thu Nov 21 14:39:39 UTC 2013
So is the 9999 Registrar the right registrar for the 100-for-own-purpose-domains or even premium domains?
Or is it just for domains which are needed for operation the registry (nic.versicherung / whois.versicherung)?
Matthias Pfeifer .versicherung
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: gtld-tech-bounces at icann.org [mailto:gtld-tech-bounces at icann.org] Im
> Auftrag von Alexander Mayrhofer
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 21. November 2013 13:05
> An: Francisco Arias; gtld-tech at icann.org
> Betreff: Re: [gtld-tech] IANA ID for "internal" registrar
> Thanks for the clarification. A colleague just noticed that the respective IANA
> registry (http://www.iana.org/assignments/registrar-ids/registrar-ids.xhtml)
> contains two more registrar IDs that look like "usable IDs", namely:
> 3; Registry Installation
> 8; Test Registrar
> Can those be used as well? Our problem is that we also have an "internal
> monitoring" registrar (which is seperate from the "registry" registrar), and we
> obviously need a third ID for that registrar as well (besides the 9999 and 9997
> ID). Is there a "private ID range" forseen in the registry?
> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > Von: Francisco Arias [mailto:francisco.arias at icann.org]
> > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 21. November 2013 13:00
> > An: Alexander Mayrhofer; gtld-tech at icann.org
> > Betreff: Re: [gtld-tech] IANA ID for "internal" registrar
> > The Registry Agreement, specification 2 says: "For cases where the
> > registry operator acts as registrar (i.e., without the use of an ICANN
> > accredited
> > registrar) 9999 should be used …"
> > There is another registrar id reserved for the ICANN SLA monitoring
> > registrar: 9997. You will see this in your on boarding request, once
> > you have signed a registry agreement.
> > Regards,
> > --
> > Francisco.
> > On 11/21/13 6:22 AM, "Alexander Mayrhofer"
> > <alexander.mayrhofer at nic.at>
> > wrote:
> > >I'm wondering what IANA ID "internal" registrars (such as those
> > >owning the "nic" 2nd-level domain, or any registrars used for
> > >monitoring) should be allocated? I understand that there was some
> > >documentation that recommended using 9999 for the "registry"
> > >registrar. But since more registrars are likely needed (such as the
> > >ICANN monitoring registrar), we probably need more than one ID.
> > >
> > >Any recommendations on that? Otherwise, we'll proceed with counting
> > "up"
> > >from 9999.. or down... or negative IDs? ;)
> > >
> > >Alex
More information about the gtld-tech