[gtld-tech] gtld-tech Digest, Vol 20, Issue 6

[Wodjenski, Sharon]

In addition to Alex's comments, I have the following questions/notes:

I24. Fields in Whois output MUST NOT appear multiple times, unless otherwise explicitly specified.
	* Does this mean that only 1 Tech Contact can be displayed?  If so, which one should be displayed if there are multiples?

I was also especially confused by I29, 30, and 32 for reasons Alex mentions.

II40.	Responses to registrar object queries MUST show at least one admin contact and one technical contact.	
	* Admin and Technical Contacts for Registrar are optional.  So while there can be multiples, there also may be none.



-----Original Message-----
From: gtld-tech-bounces at icann.org [mailto:gtld-tech-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of gtld-tech-request at icann.org
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2014 7:00 AM
To: gtld-tech at icann.org
Subject: gtld-tech Digest, Vol 20, Issue 6

Send gtld-tech mailing list submissions to
	gtld-tech at icann.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mm.icann.org_mailman_listinfo_gtld-2Dtech&d=AwICAg&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw&r=sO5DTejvWpy5yHp-sxGyZ3byYNhG_qP3vdn4HDkx5wQ&m=R7wKbIbkziLVaNPX7r6NKPvMN3XKcTjWtvH8mRkBvs0&s=0O699DzpEgoIQYK9WH1LDYa6j1IJaza4IYUUukEV_5A&e=
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	gtld-tech-request at icann.org

You can reach the person managing the list at
	gtld-tech-owner at icann.org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of gtld-tech digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re:  Draft Updated WHOIS Clarification Advisory v.20141209
      (Naoki Kambe)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 15:35:28 +0900 (JST)
From: Naoki Kambe <kambe at jprs.co.jp>
To: gtld-tech at icann.org
Subject: Re: [gtld-tech] Draft Updated WHOIS Clarification Advisory
	v.20141209
Message-ID: <20141212.153528.200378422.kambe at jprs.co.jp>
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii

Hi,

One quick comment:

  One of the objectives of these clarifications is to retain the ability
  to easily parse the output. Interested users are encouraged to
  consider the clarifications below when developing parsers for RDDS
  output.

The above objective doesn't seem much different from RDAP's one.  I'm afraid the clarified WHOIS specification might reduce motivation to support RDAP.  I'm curious about how we would migrate between WHOIS and RDAP in future.

Regards,
Naoki Kambe


------------------------------

_______________________________________________
gtld-tech mailing list
gtld-tech at icann.org
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mm.icann.org_mailman_listinfo_gtld-2Dtech&d=AwICAg&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw&r=sO5DTejvWpy5yHp-sxGyZ3byYNhG_qP3vdn4HDkx5wQ&m=R7wKbIbkziLVaNPX7r6NKPvMN3XKcTjWtvH8mRkBvs0&s=0O699DzpEgoIQYK9WH1LDYa6j1IJaza4IYUUukEV_5A&e= 


End of gtld-tech Digest, Vol 20, Issue 6
****************************************