[gtld-tech] [tmch-tech] RPM Requirement of Supporting Claims Service for Release or Allocation of Reserved Domain Names

[Elaine Pruis]

There are a few more options we can consider for Claims.  Considering there is some dissent over how to apply the RPM requirements to reserved names it would be wise to meet in London for further discussion.  That will give folks some time to come up with additional options.
Would the ICANN person managing this list please arrange for that?



Elaine Pruis
Vice President, Operations
…………………………………………
elaine at donuts.co
+1 509-899-3161



On May 27, 2014, at 5:46 AM, Wil Tan <wil at cloudregistry.net> wrote:

> 
> On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 6:23 AM, Gould, James <JGould at verisign.com> wrote:
> 
>  I prefer option 2 for the “Allocation of the reserved names” problem.  I prefer option 4 first, followed by option 3, for the “Handling the claims service for reserved names that have marks in the TMCH” problem.  
> 
> 
> Running eternal claims services is clearly not a view shared by all registries. The middle ground -- asking registrars and registries to reactivate all the claims machinery for a subset of names -- presents a significant challenge.
> 
> As such, I concur with option 4 or 3 for handling claims for reserved names with marks in TMCH.
> 
> .wil

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gtld-tech/attachments/20140527/38d13af8/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Donuts_Logo_Signature.png
Type: image/png
Size: 2931 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gtld-tech/attachments/20140527/38d13af8/Donuts_Logo_Signature.png>