[gtld-tech] RDAP question

[Andrew Newton]

My interpretation is that it says "response", and a single RDAP
response can hold many objects. Therefore this should go into
"notices".

Also I hope ICANN updates that web page once REGEXT has the EPP->RDAP
response code mappings done (and they should point to the IANA
registry for informative purposes).

-andy

On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 4:25 PM, Brian Mountford <mountford at google.com> wrote:
> That makes sense, and many of the required boilerplate remarks are the same
> for every domain, so putting them at the domain level rather than the
> overall search results level would be duplicative. But on the other hand,
> duplicative is not necessarily unwarranted: including boilerplate in every
> RDAP response is itself duplicative already, and that is mandated. So I'm
> trying to make sure I understand what ICANN has in mind exactly.
>
> For instance, this requirement:
>
> 1.5.18. A domain name RDAP response MUST contain a remarks member with a
> title “EPP Status Codes”, a description containing the string “For more
> information on domain status codes, please visit https://icann.org/epp” and
> a links member with the https://icann.org/epp URL.
>
> When returning a response to a domain search, should the remarks member
> appear in each of the domains returned in the response, or should it appear
> one level up? The latter is less duplicative, but it also means that the
> JSON for a domain will be different depending on whether it is a response to
> a direct domain lookup (in which case it will have the boilerplate remark)
> or a domain search query (in which case it will not).
>
> Brian
>
> On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 2:12 PM, Andrew Newton <andy at hxr.us> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 12:34 PM, Brian Mountford via gtld-tech
>> <gtld-tech at icann.org> wrote:
>> > Another RDAP question as it applies to the operational profile.
>> >
>> >
>> > RFC 7483 4.3. Notices and Remarks
>> >
>> > While the "remarks" array will appear in many object classes in a
>> > response,
>> > the "notices" array appears only in the topmost object of a response.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > For domain, nameserver and entity search results, should boilerplate
>> > remarks
>> > required by the operational profile appear in each constituent object,
>> > or at
>> > the top level?
>> >
>>
>> I can't answer for the "ICANN way", but I can tell you what we had in
>> mind from a standards perspective. The individual remarks on an object
>> or intended to be remarks about the object. The notices were intended
>> to be about the service or response as a whole.
>>
>> -andy
>
>