[gtld-tech] Draft RDAP Operational Profile for gTLD Registries and Registrars

[Rubens Kuhl]

> Em 5 de fev de 2016, à(s) 21:06:000, Francisco Arias <francisco.arias at icann.org> escreveu:
> 
> On 2/3/16, 4:31 AM, "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck at verisign.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>> Francisco, about a month ago I sent this message to this list:
>> 
>> http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gtld-tech/2016-January/000577.html
>> 
>> You asked a few clarifying questions, which I answered. My last reply sent on 13 January:
>> 
>> http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gtld-tech/2016-January/000592.html
>> 
>> I never did receive an answer to my original question:
>> 
>> "Will those that do not be able to defer implementation until the needed "agreement provision, 
>> waiver, or Consensus Policy" terms are in place?"
> 
> Since we are considering at least 6 months between request and deadline to implement RDAP, I’d think an interested registry would have enough time to follow the process prescribed in its agreement to obtain an amendment to have differentiated access, no?
> 
> 

Francisco,

Considering the past performance of ICANN in RSEP processes that extended far beyond 6 months, that is a very risky proposition... 

... but we would welcome having SLAs for ICANN Registry Services and Technical Services, of course. 
 


Rubens