[gtld-tech] Draft RDAP Operational Profile for gTLD Registries and Registrars
shollenbeck at verisign.com
Tue Jan 12 17:59:13 UTC 2016
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Francisco Arias [mailto:francisco.arias at icann.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2016 12:38 PM
> To: Hollenbeck, Scott
> Cc: gtld-tech at icann.org
> Subject: Re: [gtld-tech] Draft RDAP Operational Profile for gTLD
> Registries and Registrars
> On 1/12/16, 4:47 AM, "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck at verisign.com>
> >IANA's root zone database* currently lists 1,216 delegations. 901 of
> them are described as "generic", "generic-restricted", or "sponsored"
> top-level domains. Per the info you shared above, only 3 (0.003%) of
> the 901 gTLDs have an agreement that includes tiered-access provisions.
> The remainder (which represent a very significant majority) do not, and
> are thus excluded from "The current profile proposal does support/allow
> for tiered access" because "as long as an agreement provision, waiver,
> or Consensus Policy supports/allows such thing" is not met.
> >Will gTLDs that do not currently have an agreement provision, waiver,
> or Consensus Policy that allows tiered access be able to defer
> implementation until an agreement provision, waiver, or Consensus
> Policy that allows tiered access is in place?
> What implementation are you suggesting to be deferred?
Are we talking about more than one? As I understand it, the profile has been
written to describe proposed RDAP implementation requirements for gTLD
registries and registrars. I'm asking if registries and registrars that wish
to support tiered access will be able to defer an RDAP implementation until an
agreement provision, waiver, or Consensus Policy that allows tiered access for
more than 3 out of 901 gTLDs is in place.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 5924 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the gtld-tech