[gtld-tech] Draft RDAP Operational Profile for gTLD Registries and Registrars

[Francisco Arias]

On 1/12/16, 9:59 AM, "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck at verisign.com> wrote:



>>What implementation are you suggesting to be deferred?
>
>Are we talking about more than one? As I understand it, the profile has been 
>written to describe proposed RDAP implementation requirements for gTLD 
>registries and registrars. I'm asking if registries and registrars that wish 
>to support tiered access will be able to defer an RDAP implementation until an 
>agreement provision, waiver, or Consensus Policy that allows tiered access for 
>more than 3 out of 901 gTLDs is in place.

Just so that I understand, why would you like a registry/registrar to defer their RDAP implementation until there is a tiered access provision/policy?

-- 
Francisco


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4564 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gtld-tech/attachments/20160113/41829b66/smime.p7s>