[gtld-tech] Draft RDAP Operational Profile for gTLD Registries and Registrars
andy at hxr.us
Wed Jan 13 21:56:05 UTC 2016
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 4:03 PM, Francisco Arias
<francisco.arias at icann.org> wrote:
> On 1/12/16, 9:59 AM, "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck at verisign.com> wrote:
>>>What implementation are you suggesting to be deferred?
>>Are we talking about more than one? As I understand it, the profile has been
>>written to describe proposed RDAP implementation requirements for gTLD
>>registries and registrars. I'm asking if registries and registrars that wish
>>to support tiered access will be able to defer an RDAP implementation until an
>>agreement provision, waiver, or Consensus Policy that allows tiered access for
>>more than 3 out of 901 gTLDs is in place.
> Just so that I understand, why would you like a registry/registrar to defer their RDAP implementation until there is a tiered access provision/policy?
I don't think Scott is desiring such a thing. I think he is asking if
a registry or registrar can use the lack of provision, waiver, etc...
as a reason not to deploy RDAP.
More information about the gtld-tech