[gtld-tech] Registrar Expiration Date I-D

Francisco Obispo fobispo at uniregistry.link
Tue Jan 26 21:16:10 UTC 2016

Hi Andy,

The RAR (the entity that has the relationship with the customer), has both dates.. if the RAR added that date to its whois output, would provide a similar experience than what you’re describing here.

But the RY doesn’t have that piece of data, and getting in in sync would be a tremendous amount of effort, not in dev, but operationally and then making sure it’s current.


Francisco Obispo
Uniregistry Inc.
On 26 Jan 2016, at 13:10, Andrew Newton wrote:

> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 3:54 PM, Jody Kolker <jkolker at godaddy.com> wrote:
>> Putting both of the expiration dates in the registry whois does explain why there is a difference between the dates.  To me it does not address any confusion related to this issue.
> When dealing with Amazon and other big Internet retailers, they let me
> know when they have shipped my order and the details of how the
> shipping company is handling my shipment even though I never enter
> into a contractual relationship with the shipping company. Yes, this
> might confuse some people but in general it is known throughout the
> industry as good customer service.
> -andy
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gtld-tech/attachments/20160126/e3877d2a/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 841 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gtld-tech/attachments/20160126/e3877d2a/signature-0001.asc>

More information about the gtld-tech mailing list