[gtld-tech] Registrar 999x domains x Claims notices
eduardo.alvarez at icann.org
Sat Feb 4 00:48:55 UTC 2023
Can you clarify which claims log you are referring to? Otherwise I think this might help address your question since the TMCH functional specifications (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-regext-tmch-func-spec-15) largely rely in the term of "effective allocation" of domain names. If we refer to the definitions provided it is stated that:
* Effective allocation: A DN is considered effectively allocated
when the DN object for the DN has been created in the SRS of the
Registry and has been assigned to the effective user. A DN object
in status "pendingCreate" or any other status that precedes the
first time a DN is assigned to an end-user is not considered an
effective allocation. A DN object created internally by the
Registry for subsequent delegation to another Registrant is not
considered an effective allocation.
Domain names reserved by the registry operator under IANA IDs 9998 and 9999 would therefore not be considered effective allocations.
From: gtld-tech <gtld-tech-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of rubensk--- via gtld-tech <gtld-tech at icann.org>
Reply-To: "rubensk at nic.br" <rubensk at nic.br>
Date: Wednesday, February 1, 2023 at 8:12 AM
To: "gtld-tech at icann.org" <gtld-tech at icann.org>
Subject: [gtld-tech] Registrar 999x domains x Claims notices
My understanding was that registrar 999x (9999/9998) registrations do not require a claims service, even if the label is in the TMDB claims list.
But I couldn't find this specify in the RPM requirements... is it right or wrong ?
What was my original doubt though was about sending that such registration happened to the claims log. So assuming it does not require a notice, does it need to be recorded in the claims log ?
gtld-tech mailing list
gtld-tech at icann.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 4872 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the gtld-tech