[ICANN Academy WG] Reality, Realism, and Responsiveness -- a few of the three Rs that we must consider + Accountability

Wed Aug 29 13:17:42 UTC 2012

Dear Marilyn,

thank you for your thoughts. I will just reply to some of them, because many
things have been said by others already.

I agree with previous speaker, that modern communication tools can never
replace F2F meetings. E-learning, if it is well organised (the DIPLO model
is definitely one), is a valuable instrument to raise awareness, get people
involved globally on an entry level. To set up an online course on an
advanced level has the same challenges, I would say even more, than a F2F
meeting. For example: a global, holistic online-course will take about 2
weeks, instead of a compromised 2-3 day course. 

On the entry (or contributor) level a lot of e-learning material exists
already within ICANN. The WG focused on a training programme for the
leadership level, F2F because it is time effective and the networking aspect
is of great value. The aim was helping break down the silos. All this has
been discussed in the past among the At-large WG, but now that we are
working in an expanded WG we must reconsider and discuss all option.  

However in a modular system - I am referring now to pyramid - advanced
e-learning and F2F, or a combination of both is not contradictory. You can
add and improve modules as per need and learn from it. Such an inclusive
model should be the long term aim for this WG. 

“Is this introduction, intro-doctrination, 
”

Definitely not! The term “indoctrination” was used by some members in this
list and I have difficulties to understand where this comes from. Sending
out the curriculum to the WG for comments should prove the opposite. We
experienced a confusing meeting  in Prague, questioning who is responsible
and in charge of what. Whilst presenting a draft curriculum I was hoping we
can focus now on the content and agree on a curriculum for Toronto.

As for now, following the discussion on the list and the doodle, I see only
a minimum chance that we have a pilot in Toronto and I agree here with you
that the questions:  “Why: Who: What: When: AND WHAT NOT to do: what to co
exist with, etc.” should be further discussed and we should build consensus
on these questions.

A final decision must be taken after closing the doodle tomorrow 30.Aug.
24:00 UTC and then we can check the options for a (additional?) meeting in
Toronto. The official WG meeting is already scheduled for Wednesday, 17
October between 11:00-12:30. This time will be not enough to discus all
matters, but a conference call or email exchange can help to prepare the
meeting.

Let’s prove the options once we have a final decision

Best Sandra

Von: at-large-icann-academy-ad-hoc-wg-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org
[mailto:at-large-icann-academy-ad-hoc-wg-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] Im
Auftrag von Marilyn Cade
Gesendet: Dienstag, 28. August 2012 17:25
An: Alain Berranger; tyokunbo at yahoo.co.uk
Cc: At Large ICANN Academy
Betreff: [ICANN Academy WG] Reality, Realism, and Responsiveness -- a few of
the three Rs that we must consider + Accountability

I am struggling with what I will say in this email. 

first, I want all of us to stop, and think, and then try to agree. 

What is the purpose of an ICANN sponsored/funded/supported 'academy'? 

Is an 'academy' from ICANN our best strategy? 

What are the topics? 

Who is the audience?

What is the credibility of an ICANN academy?

Is this introduction, intro-doctrination, or something else?

Given the harsh demands of work on the Constituencies/SGs/ALAC, and probably
others, is this 'overview' or a more formalized training approach that is
'verified' with the entities?

I understand that some are citing examples  of sessions held in Europe or
Latin America with guest speakers, none of whom are certified, or
accountable to any entity, nor do they represent any official view.  that
has great value.  

Let's introduce a different model:  ONLINE training.  

For instance, the DIPLO training is in fact highly successful in reaching
large numbers of interested parties. Some become participants. Many just are
better informed and more aware of ICANN, or IG, or the topic that is
presented. 

I have no relationship to DIPLO,but I do have a concern. The Academy as
proposed by whomever designed it is based on a model that makes assumptions
that to me are elitist, and require face to face for a few.  The BC strongly
wants to support training for the many -- including information that can be
widely distributed by entities like the BC, etc. 

Some seem, again, to want to provide indoctrination/orientation to NC
appointees. It is of concern to the BC that people who know nothing about
ICANN are being appointed to leadership positions. BUT, any
information/briefings/orientation must be neutral.  Orientation of newly
appointed reps, whether Board or other, could be a one half day orientation
session with the chairs of the various SOs/AC/Constituencies/SGs on Friday.
That is a simple matter; less 'stressful' and is more an orientation session
than an indoctrination opportunity. It also can be accomplished in a 1/2 day
to 2/3 day segment. 

Decisions are needed on who can participate: all appointees? Chairs and
designees? staff -- whom? BUT, it simplifies one of the objectives of the
Academy and allows us to move the Academy concept into a more realistic and
responsible discussion, which is not trying to solve too many problems at
once. 

summary: 

We are struggling with implementing a process that simply lacks full
support.  I have to focus on my responsibilities as BC Chair. I can come in
a day early, but only if we decide now. I cannot stay after the ICANN
meeting -- I have to travel to Montreal to a global event on ICTs. I'll
travel Friday/late afternoon/early evening, so have some time during day
Friday/post ICANN for a short discussion/debrief. 

However, the ICANN Board MUST meet in Toronto, or run the risk of conveying
to the community that they simply don't care about accountability and
transparency.  So, we should assume an ICANN Board meeting on Friday. That
still leaves a two hour segment Friday afternoon. However, I have work to do
with my Constituency/SG, and I need to plan accordingly. 

Can we not use part of Friday - pre ICANN - and discuss key questions:

Why:

Who:

What:

When:

AND WHAT NOT to do: what to co exist with, etc. 

Question to ICANN staff: 

Can you accept that an academy may not be a physical event, but could best
be an online and widely available service that is online? That doesn't
preclude an ocassional face to face, but online training is a different
matter in terms of development, skills, and capability.  And reach. 

Is someone on staff or Board somehow so focused on having a physical
'academy' that using online training mechanisms are  not an option? We
should determine now how flexible staff/board are willing to be on this.  

And, I need to assess how much resource, commitment and time that the BC can
devote to the needs we see for enhancing support for participation from
business and others. 

Marilyn Cade, BC Chair

  _____  

Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 10:03:14 -0400
From: alain.berranger at gmail.com
To: tyokunbo at yahoo.co.uk
CC: at-large-icann-academy-ad-hoc-wg at icann.org
Subject: Re: [ICANN Academy WG] Pilot leadership training in Toronto -
decision on the dates

Three quick points:

1) the majority of those expressing a preference for postponing are all
experienced and well trained in ICANN matters;

2) would it make sense to poll the prospective trainees? They have the most
at stake in learning.

3) an important benefit of training is the networking between trainees;
given that this training involves a good chunk of ICANN stakeholders'
leadership, this networking would produce substantial value.

Alain

On Tuesday, August 28, 2012, TYokunbo Abiola wrote:

Having read about the Toronto training program for some time, I strongly
agree with Bill's ideas.

Regards,
Adetokunbo Abiola

--- On Tue, 28/8/12, William Drake <william.drake at uzh.ch> wrote:

From: William Drake <william.drake at uzh.ch>
Subject: Re: [ICANN Academy WG] Pilot leadership training in Toronto -
decision on the dates
To: "sandra hoferichter" <info at hoferichter.eu>
Cc: "at-large-icann-academy-ad-hoc-wg at icann.org"
<at-large-icann-academy-ad-hoc-wg at icann.org>
Date: Tuesday, 28 August, 2012, 3:18

Hi

While I strongly support capacity building and outreach/inreach and would
not want to cause frustration among those who've worked hard on this, I
think I agree with Avri and Chuck that postponement merits serious
consideration.  There still seems to be different baseline visions in play
with regard to goals, substance, mechanics and governance, and it's not
obvious that these can all be effectively resolved quickly enough to ensure
a good outcome in Toronto.  And if a "not ready for prime time" version is
rushed out and doesn't go splendidly, this could have a negative impact on
community perceptions of the utility of such efforts going forward.  I'd
rather see it unambiguously done right and build the support needed for a
regular activity than have it be the object of gossip and dissensus (not
that that could happen in ICANN, but
).

A little more percolation and community direction seems advisable to me.

Best,

Bill 

On Aug 28, 2012, at 7:53 AM, sandra hoferichter wrote:

> Hi Avri, postpone the programme would be that last option only, which I
put not as an option yet. Taking into consideration the NomCom selections
and the new CEO participation, I still see some very good reasons to go for
Toronto. The Autumn meeting was not proposed just by chance. Furthermore I
believe we can get things done, now that we are in the dialogue. 
> 
> Best Sandra
> 
> (Note: This message was send from my iPhone - I do apologise for any
misspelling.)
> 
> Am 28.08.2012 um 01:01 schrieb "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes at verisign.com
<http://mc/compose?to=cgomes%40verisign.com> >:
> 
>> Considering how late it is before the Toronto meetings, this is worth
considering.  At the same time, I personally will contribute however
possible to do what needs to be done if we keep the Toronto target.
>> 
>> Chuck
>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: at-large-icann-academy-ad-hoc-wg-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org
<http://mc/compose?to=at-large-icann-academy-ad-hoc-wg-bounces%40atlarge-lis
ts.icann.org> 
>>> [mailto:at-large-icann-academy-ad-hoc-wg-bounces at atlarge-
>>> lists.icann.org] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
>>> Sent: Monday, August 27, 2012 6:20 PM
>>> To: at-large-icann-academy-ad-hoc-wg at icann.org
<http://mc/compose?to=at-large-icann-academy-ad-hoc-wg%40icann.org> 
>>> Subject: Re: [ICANN Academy WG] Pilot leadership training in Toronto -
>>> decision on the dates
>>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>>> other ideas.
>>> 
>>> Would it be possible/reasonable to add the option of postponing the
>>> leadership training from Toronto to a later time when a properly
>>> constituted plan can be considered?
>>> 
>>> Thanks
>>> 
>>> avri
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 27 Aug 2012, at 17:00, sandra hoferichter wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Dear all,
>>>> 
>>>> thank you again for the valuable comments which has been posted on
>>> this list. I did not respond to everyone, but they should all feed into
>>> the further discussion and the final curriculum.
>>>> 
>>>> Coming back to one of Filiz' earlier email I like to draw your
>>> attention to the following question and ask you kindly to express your
>>> opinion in a doodle.
>>>> 
>>>> Due to the time conflicts for some assigned participants, we like to
>>> get a clearer picture about the duration of the leadership training in
>>> Toronto.
>>>> 
>>>> I propose 3 options and ask all WG members*** to choose, what do you
>>>> think is the most appropriate solution. Feel free to consider also
>>> the
>>>> feedback of your SO / AC / SG chair whilst making the choice
>>>> here:http://www.doodle.com/4c4fa7dehuaksckx
>>>> 
>>>> *** For group balancing reasons I ask the recent ALAC programme
>>> committee members (Avri, Tijani, Sala, Carlos) only to reply on the
>>> doodle.
>>>> 
>>>> The options are:
>>>> 
>>>> 1.       A one day orientation programme on Fri, 12th October à this
>>> will avoid time conflicts, especially for the GNSO, board and current
>>> 

-- 
Alain Berranger, B.Eng, MBA

Member, Board of Directors, CECI, http://www.ceci.ca
<http://www.ceci.ca/en/about-ceci/team/board-of-directors/> 

Executive-in-residence, Schulich School of Business, www.schulich.yorku.ca

Treasurer, Global Knowledge Partnership Foundation, www.gkpfoundation.org

NA representative, Chasquinet Foundation, www.chasquinet.org
Chair, NPOC, NCSG, ICANN, http://npoc.org/
O:+1 514 484 7824; M:+1 514 704 7824
Skype: alain.berranger

_______________________________________________
at-large-icann-academy-ad-hoc-wg mailing list
at-large-icann-academy-ad-hoc-wg at atlarge-lists.icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large-icann-academy-ad-hoc-wg

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/private/icann-academy-wg/attachments/20120829/2041a0d6/attachment.html>