[ICANN Academy WG] ICANN Academy WG meetings in Toronto rescheduled

[Rumy Kanis]

Hello,

I agree that the primary focus should be 1 and 2. I also agree with comments on this list that there should be several learning goals. Preferably per section. But I'm a training purist so I might be pushing things here ;-)

And a question about point 3. Will we only discuss F2F vs on-line (or a mix), or will we also discuss specific training methods used throughout the programme? I don't know if there will be time for this in Toronto, but it would be good to look at this in a later stage. There are many different training methods, each with their own success/failure rates: a presentation is totally different from a workshop, or an exercise, group discussion etc. And each method requires a different type of "resource person"  (lecturer, presenter, instructor, moderator, facilitator, content-expert, whatever...). Having a clear idea of goals and methodologies, might make it easier to select the "resource persons" needed. Just some food for thought.

Kind regards,
Rumy


On Sep 12, 2012, at 9:48 PM, sandra hoferichter wrote:

> Dear all,
>  
> I received the information that the Academy WG is now scheduled for: Wednesday, 17 October 7-10 a.m. Although not all of us will make it to attend a 3 hours meeting, I hope to meet many of you at least partly.
>  
> From the recent exchange on this mailing list I draw the conclusion that generally the support and the need for a leadership training programme is given SOAC wide. If we can agree furthermore, that the long term goal of this WG is, to work on a modular inclusive capacity building system, which allows us to implement new modules in the future and modify existing modules, I would now focus on a leadership pilot project for Beijing. I am referring here again to the modular pyramid (enclosed), which is not written in stone but should serve as a template for our work.
>  
> That means for our agenda in Toronto we have to:
> 1.       specify the target group (incoming and / or current leaders)
> 2.       agree on the learning goal
> 3.       discuss the methodology (online / F2F / proposed resource person)
> 4.       agree on the dates and the duration of this pilot programme
> 5.       discuss and agree with ICANN staff how to implement this project
>  
> As for the curriculum, I propose to set up a drafting team in Toronto which will work on the curriculum afterwards and present it to the wider WG later this year.
>  
> Please let me know if you can generally agree to the proposed course of action and post your comments and changes here on this list.
>  
> Looking forward to it!
>  
> Best Sandra
>  
> <ICANN Academy_Pyramid_20120626.pdf>_______________________________________________
> at-large-icann-academy-ad-hoc-wg mailing list
> at-large-icann-academy-ad-hoc-wg at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large-icann-academy-ad-hoc-wg

-- 
Rumy Kanis
Training Services Manager
RIPE NCC

Follow us on Twitter for the fastest and latest RIPE NCC Training news!
@TrainingRIPENCC