[ICANN Academy WG] Outcome of the survey

[sandra hoferichter]

Welcome back to the ICANN Academy working group!

 

First of all I think it is never too late to send you my best wishes for the
new year, for some parts of the world, like China, I am even right in time.

 

With some delay from my side I send you enclosed the survey report. The aim
of this survey was to get more detailed information about the different
needs of the various stakeholder groups within ICANN, in order to
development of a moulded framework structure for all capacity building
provisions in ICANN. This framework shall then:

 

1.       mirror all current Capacity Building provisions (modules) within
ICANN

2.       help to identify possible missing modules within ICANN

3.       help to harmonise and synchronise all current and future modules

 

The report enclosed provides no information about the stakeholder groups
which participated in this exercise. Nevertheless this information is
existing - an overview is provided below. Over all 22. surveys were
submitted. I must admit I was hoping to receive some more surveys, on the
other hand we can expect that some results were jointly submitted by a group
of people. The following Organizations & Committees did not participate in
the survey: ASO, RSSAC, SSAC. 

 

The following groups participated:

 


1.

ccNSO


2.

GNSO / RySG


3.

At-Large / NARALO


4.

At-Large/ EURALO


5.

At-Large/ APRALO


6.

At-Large / AFRALO


7.

At-Large / EURALO


8.

At-Large / LACRALO


9.

At-Large / LACRALO


10.

At-Large / LACRALO


11.

NomCom


12.

GAC


13.

At-Large / EURALO


14.

At-Large / APRALO


15.

GNSO / NPOC


16.

GNSO /NPOC


17.

GAC


18.

GNSO / NPOC


19.

GNSO / NPOC


20.

GNSO / NPOC


21.

GNSO / BC


22.

GNSO / NPOC

 

I will not start to analyse this survey at this point, because I want to
find out first what you are reading from the results. The only thing which
is pretty clear for me, and I would like to share with you here is, that
various needs were identified and I see the WG is on the right track working
on a modular system which provides different types of programmes for
different groups respectively level of engagement. One size will not fit
all.

 

As for the future course of action I think we can organise a conference call
prior to Beijing and meet there personally. Your suggestions in this regard
are welcome. 

 

I am looking forward to your comments

 

Best Sandra 

 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/private/icann-academy-wg/attachments/20130209/a7b73f8f/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: SurveySummary_01152013.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 41237 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/private/icann-academy-wg/attachments/20130209/a7b73f8f/SurveySummary_01152013.pdf>