[ICANN Academy WG] Survey and next steps until Beijing

Thu Mar 21 18:46:16 UTC 2013

Very sorry I have had to cancel my Beijing trip due to litigation emergency. Is there remote access to the meeting being planned? If so please let me have details and I will try to make it despite time difference.
Jonathan

Shapiro Cohen
Barristers & Solicitors | Patent and Trade-mark Agents
Tel: 613 232-5300 Fax: 613 563-9231
Web: www.shapirocohen.com E-mail: info at shapirocohen.com
Mail: P.O. Box 13002, Kanata, ON Canada K2K 0E2
Courier: Suite 200, 411 Legget Drive, Ottawa, ON Canada K2K 3C9

This correspondence is intended for the person to whom it is addressed and contains information that is confidential, and/or privileged to the named recipient, and may be proprietary in nature. It is not to be used by any other person and/or organization. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by telephone (collect) and/or return e-mail.
WARNING: FROM TIME TO TIME, OUR SPAM SCANNERS ELIMINATE LEGITIMATE EMAIL FROM CLIENTS OR THEY ARE OTHERWISE LOST THROUGH ELECTRONIC PROBLEMS. IF YOUR EMAIL CONTAINS IMPORTANT INSTRUCTIONS, PLEASE ENSURE THAT WE ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF THOSE INSTRUCTIONS PROMPTLY OR RESEND BY FAX AND/OR TELEPHONE.

-----Original Message-----
From: at-large-icann-academy-ad-hoc-wg-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto:at-large-icann-academy-ad-hoc-wg-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] On Behalf Of Hong Xue
Sent: March 21, 2013 1:51 AM
To: sandra hoferichter
Cc: ICANN Academy WG
Subject: Re: [ICANN Academy WG] Survey and next steps until Beijing

Dear Sandra,

The WG meeting is conflicting with one of my ccNSO meetings so I could be late for 30 minutes.

Regarding Point 1, I'm impressed that 100% believe "Understanding current issues under discussion in ICANN" be on the curriculum. I assume that item is not for the "leaders" who should be knowing what is going on at ICANN (matrix) right now.

Hong

On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 1:03 AM, sandra hoferichter <info at hoferichter.eu> wrote:
> Dear all,
>
>
>
> the next ICANN meeting in Beijing is approaching soon and I would like
> to agree with you on the agenda for the ICANN Academy WG session on:
>
>
>
> Monday, 8 April 2013
>
> Time: 15:00-16:00
> Meeting Room: Function 6
>
>
>
> I hope this time is not conflicting with other commitments and we can
> have just such a good session as in Toronto.
>
>
>
> For the agenda I propose:
>
> Review of the ICANN Academy Survey (Moderator: Sandra Hoferichter) (10
> mins) ICANN Online Education Platform and the role of the ICANN
> Academy WG - Open Discussion with Matthew Shears (25 mins) Next Steps
> to be undertaken between Beijing, Durban and Buenos Aires
> (Moderator: Sandra Hoferichter) (25 mins)
>
> Background information 1-3:
>
> to point 1.
>
> So far we there was not much feedback on the results of the survey. I
> enclose it again, encouraging you to send your analysis until Beijing.
> I think it would be wise not to spend too much time on the survey
> analysis, but just to summarise results in our session. The following
> comments on the survey where posted so far:
>
> Hong: ....Although it is diversified, Responses from at-large community
> are almost a half and some stakeholder groups are still missing...
>
> Tijani: regarding Q 12.... most people want it (the leader ship
> programme) to be prior to the ICANN meeting.
>
> Avri:
>
> 1. (2) I am surprised that so many are offering education to their members.
>
> 2. (5) Looking at those that got over 80%, I think we have a good
> basis for planning a curriculum.
>
> 100 Understanding current issues under discussion in ICANN
>
> 90.5 Understanding ICANN and its processes
>
> 85.7 Training or orientation needs for new members in your group 80
> Understanding ICANN's role in the Internet governance eco system - I
> think this pretty closely matches the curriculum those of us who have
> been on this project for a very long first proposed.  I suggest that
> this is what we should focus on.
>
> 3. (6,7)  It looks like we should be thinking of both Newbie and
> Leader orientations
>
> 4. (10)  I am not sure what other time people would want.
>
> to point 2.
>
> Recently ICANN engaged Matthew Shears to develop an online education
> platform for ICANN. I had already the chance to talk to him and the
> aim is very much inline with what our WG proposed in the past: pull
> together existing things, add new content and provide different
> formats and mechanisms to meet the different needs of ICANN
> Stakeholder groups.  Matthew is already included in this mailing list
> and he is planning to join us in Beijing, if his schedule allows.
> During the session he would then explain his ideas in detail and we should figure out how the WG can support him.
> This online platform will  be one module in the ICANN Academy framework.
>
> to point 3.
>
> Besides the development of the online platform we should look into
> opportunities to start a pilot leadership programme for the next AGM.
> The results from the survey clearly show that there is a demand for
> such a F2F leadership programme (71,4%).  Not the majority, but 38,1%,
> agreed that the 3rd ICANN meeting in the year is the best time to schedule such a programme.
> We should  take this as a fact for the time being and learn from this
> first trail.
>
>
>
> Thank you for reading this long email to the end and I am waiting for
> your comments!
>
> Best Sandra
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> at-large-icann-academy-ad-hoc-wg mailing list
> at-large-icann-academy-ad-hoc-wg at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large-icann-academy-ad-hoc-wg
>

--
Professor Dr. Hong Xue
Director of Institute for the Internet Policy & Law (IIPL) Beijing Normal University http://www.iipl.org.cn/
19 Xin Jie Kou Wai Street
Beijing 100875 China

_______________________________________________
at-large-icann-academy-ad-hoc-wg mailing list at-large-icann-academy-ad-hoc-wg at atlarge-lists.icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large-icann-academy-ad-hoc-wg