[Internal-cg] RFP - publishable draft?

Fri Aug 29 18:26:28 UTC 2014

Milton,
Thank you again for yr analysis
Yes I could make a consensus with your last suggestion
Pls go ahead and I thank you for that.
By the way do you know any ting about a book published in 70 s about that
group?
tks and have a nice week-end ,if I do not hear from you
Kavouss

2014-08-29 20:12 GMT+02:00 Mohamed El Bashir <mbashir at mbash.net>:

> After reviewing Kavouss RFP updates, I prefer to keep the text " light
> coordination role" and I am fine with the rest of the updates .
>
> We suppose to finished and published the RFP yesterday, I propose move
> ahead and publish the latest version as agreed before the IGF.
>
> Kind Regards,
> Mohamed
>
> On 29 Aug 2014, at 19:47, Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Dear Manal
> ,
> I am not pointing toward any one who made the suggestion that the
> adjective " Light " being added to the word or term " Coordination "
> I am just saysing that ICG tasks . interalia, is to coordinate the
> activities .
> This does not any thing to do with TOP down or button up process .Just it
> does not feet. It give the impression that the activities of ICCG on this
> matter is a light activitiwes and not a complete and in-depth
> Tks
> Kavouss
>
>
> 2014-08-29 19:10 GMT+02:00 Manal Ismail <manal at tra.gov.eg>:
>
>> This was not the intention of course .. I have inserted this clause “in
>> order to help ICG maintain its light coordination role” as I thought 2
>> things would make it more convincing for non-operational parties to work
>> through the operational communities processes:
>>
>> -          to make sure the ICG does not have a top-down decision-making
>> authority, and
>>
>> -          to make sure their contributions are considered early within
>> the process, and directly discussed with the relevant party
>>
>> Just thought to clarify, but I’m flexible should colleagues feel it does
>> not serve the purpose of the first bullet ..
>>
>>
>>
>> Kind Regards
>>
>> --Manal
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* internal-cg-bounces at icann.org [mailto:
>> internal-cg-bounces at icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Kavouss Arasteh
>> *Sent:* Friday, August 29, 2014 6:45 PM
>> *To:* Milton L Mueller
>>
>> *Cc:* Coordination Group
>> *Subject:* Re: [Internal-cg] RFP - publishable draft?
>>
>>
>>
>> Dear Milton,
>>
>> Thank you very much for your kind response .You are among the most
>> knowledgeable and competent as far as I understand the exchange of message.
>>
>> Pls kindly note that the term LIGHT before coordination, weakenes our
>> actions .It could be interpreted that the coordination actions that we
>> undertake is not sufficiently serious as it is qualified by the adjective
>> LIGHT.
>>
>>
>>
>> Would it cause any difficulty that we delete that and just refer to
>> coordination without any qualification.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Kavouss
>>
>>
>>
>> 2014-08-29 15:54 GMT+02:00 Milton L Mueller <mueller at syr.edu>:
>>
>> My opinions regarding Kavouss’s proposed changes:
>>
>>
>>
>> Would prefer to keep “light” in there.
>>
>> OK to remove the word “only” from the paragraph on Comments
>>
>> OK to replace “direct” with “forward”
>>
>> OK to replace “encourages” with “urges”
>>
>>
>>
>> Milton L Mueller
>>
>> Laura J and L. Douglas Meredith Professor
>>
>> Syracuse University School of Information Studies
>>
>> http://faculty.ischool.syr.edu/mueller/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* internal-cg-bounces at icann.org [mailto:
>> internal-cg-bounces at icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Martin Boyle
>> *Sent:* Friday, August 29, 2014 8:46 AM
>> *To:* Kavouss Arasteh; Daniel Karrenberg
>>
>>
>> *Cc:* Coordination Group
>> *Subject:* Re: [Internal-cg] RFP - publishable draft?
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks Alissa for your work on this.  I’m sure we could continue
>> word-smithing this for a long time, and I’m happy to go.
>>
>>
>>
>> Kavouss’s comment on light:  I like the term as it reminds everyone that
>> we are not planning to play the autocrats.  But if non-native English
>> speakers find the meaning obscure I’m ok without.
>>
>>
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>>
>>
>> Martin
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* internal-cg-bounces at icann.org [
>> mailto:internal-cg-bounces at icann.org <internal-cg-bounces at icann.org>] *On
>> Behalf Of *Kavouss Arasteh
>> *Sent:* 29 August 2014 13:32
>> *To:* Daniel Karrenberg
>> *Cc:* Coordination Group
>> *Subject:* Re: [Internal-cg] RFP - publishable draft?
>>
>>
>>
>> Dear Alissa,
>>
>> Dear All,
>>
>> I suggest some small amendments to make various parts of the text
>> consistent with each other
>>
>> See attachment
>>
>> Kavouss  the l
>>
>>
>>
>> 2014-08-29 13:37 GMT+02:00 Daniel Karrenberg <daniel.karrenberg at ripe.net
>> >:
>>
>> On 28.08.14 23:36 , Alissa Cooper wrote:
>> > ...
>>
>> >
>> > Are there any objections to publishing this as a draft (and having the
>> > secretariat host it on our web site and make an announcement about its
>> > existence) by Sept 1?
>>
>> I support publishing this as a daft with Elise's corrections.
>>
>> Daniel
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Internal-cg mailing list
>> Internal-cg at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/internal-cg/attachments/20140829/01d8ce20/attachment.html>