[Internal-cg] Placeholder questions from ALAC
joseph.alhadeff at oracle.com
Mon Oct 13 11:09:40 UTC 2014
From an ICC-BASIS perspective I would highlight a caution that I have
stated previously on behalf of our stakeholder group. The transition
should be limited to the implications of what happens due to the change
in NTIAs role. We are not suggesting that issues beyond that scope are
not important, but rather that they may best be considered after the
transition. ICC-BASIS strongly favors limiting the number and
complexity of the topics that will be addressed as part of the
transition to those that pertain to the transition.
On 10/13/2014 3:03 AM, Russ Mundy wrote:
> On Oct 12, 2014, at 8:23 PM, Alissa Cooper <alissa at cooperw.in
> <mailto:alissa at cooperw.in>> wrote:
>> When I asked Olivier for examples of orphan issues, he said:
>> "Charging structure or the lack thereof and languages that IANA can
>> function in."
> These sound like they are items that are outside of the current
> contract (unless he's saying that a $0 contract means lack of
> charging). Although there may be other examples, I think these two
> things fall outside of the ICG remit since removing NTIA and the NTIA
> / ICANN contract would not have any relationship to these examples.
>> On Oct 12, 2014, at 5:02 PM, Russ Housley <housley at vigilsec.com
>> <mailto:housley at vigilsec.com>> wrote:
>>> I'm not sure that there are any orphan issues that directly impact
>>> the IANA registries. There are certainly issues that span more than
>>> one operational community. Can you explain what is meant here?
>>> On Oct 12, 2014, at 10:25 AM, Alissa Cooper wrote:
>>>> The ALAC chair has shared a few placeholder questions with me for
>>>> our Tuesday session and I wanted to pass them on:
>>>> * How decisions are made?
>>>> * How will proposals be consolidated?
>>>> * How does the ICG suggest handling Orphan Issues that do not fit in one or another operational community proposal?
>>>> * Proposals vs. Inputs -- will Inputs only be comments on the proposals? Can Inputs be any types of input? Will inputs from ICG members be considered on the same level as Proposals?
>>>> * Emphasize that Accountability component is needed for all proposals coming to the ICG.
>> Internal-cg mailing list
>> Internal-cg at icann.org <mailto:Internal-cg at icann.org>
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at icann.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Internal-cg