[Internal-cg] consensus building

Kavouss Arasteh kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com
Wed Sep 3 10:10:19 UTC 2014

I do not know what we are dealing here
Please kindly read my doc on consensus building sent to you last night
Vrsion 4

2014-09-03 10:28 GMT+02:00 Alissa Cooper <alissa at cooperw.in>:

> Wolf-Ulrich,
> Thanks for your work on this.
> On 9/2/14, 1:19 AM, "WUKnoben" <wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de> wrote:
> >
> >* “small minority”: should further be discussed. I added
> >  the condition that a recommendation is not reached if at least one of
> >the ICG
> >  communities (according to the list) as a whole is firmly and formally
> >opposed.
> >  That would mean a formal written objection by the community leadership
> >on
> >  behalf of their community.
> >
> I’m not sure this matches what was being discussed on the list. If we use
> the text Martin had suggested, I think the third bullet under section 4(b)
> should read:
> "After enough time has passed for the ICG to consider and attempt to
> accommodate objections, the ICG can reach a conclusion if at most a small
> minority disagrees and their objections have been documented.  It is not
> expected that the representatives of an operational community
> significantly and directly affected by a conclusion would be overruled in
> this process.”
> Alissa
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/internal-cg/attachments/20140903/bb8dc3ad/attachment.html>

More information about the Internal-cg mailing list