[NCAP-Discuss] Draft final Study 1 report: "re-registered name collisions"

[Danny McPherson]

> On Apr 30, 2020, at 5:44 PM, Rubens Kuhl <rubensk at nic.br> wrote:
> 
> Note that I am not a fan of using the word collision to characterise it, since it's more like a leak than a collision, but everybody started using that terminology so it's fruitless to question it at this point in time. We all know what it means.

I don’t like introducing new words (leaks) or imprecise terms or propagating them in an already confusing topic.  We should be precise and accurate in what we say.  

A re-registration is not colliding with anything within the same global single root RZM namespace and it’s expressly out of the scope of the very definition provided therein.  The text we gave Karen is inaccurate and conflicted and needs to be repaired. 

-danny 

> 
> Rubens
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NCAP-Discuss mailing list
> NCAP-Discuss at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ncap-discuss
> 
> _______________________________________________
> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.