[NCAP-Discuss] Revised draft of NCAP Study 1 report

[Aikman-Scalese, Anne]

NCAP Panelists may find the ICANN Board’s public comment on the Sub Pro Initial Report helpful.  It is summarized below in SubPro’s Subgroup B working document.  The emphasis from the Board is on cooperation between SubPro and NCAP.
Anne


[cid:image001.png at 01D5DD0A.40A5B230]


From: NCAP-Discuss <ncap-discuss-bounces at icann.org> On Behalf Of Rubens Kuhl
Sent: Thursday, February 6, 2020 3:44 PM
To: ncap-discuss at icann.org
Subject: Re: [NCAP-Discuss] Revised draft of NCAP Study 1 report



Although Sub Pro has not yet considered the language of its Final Report, some in Sub Pro Leadership have said that since no Consensus appears to exist on adopting a new Name Collision Framework, the Sub Pro WG is required to fall back to the 90-day Controlled Interruption practice used in the 2012 round,   However,  numerous public commenters filed comment on the Sub Pro Initial Report stating that Sub Pro should "defer to the SSAC".  I assume the Sub Pro Final Report will note the "deference to SSAC" but it appears possible that Leadership may not feel comfortable designating that as a Consensus opinion.  (I am sure Jeff and Rubens will advise when that discussion occurs – and may even send the proposed text of  the Final Report to the NCAP if we establish a way to work together.)


I wouldn't qualify 2 as as numerous comments supporting deferring to SSAC. One cluster was IPC/USPS, the other was ALAC. When analysing comments, they are usually deduplicated to more accurately represent diversity.



Rubens


________________________________

This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ncap-discuss/attachments/20200206/6c9934e5/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 32279 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ncap-discuss/attachments/20200206/6c9934e5/image001-0001.png>