[NCAP-Discuss] Revised draft of NCAP Study 1 report

[Rubens Kuhl]

> 
> 
> Although Sub Pro has not yet considered the language of its Final Report, some in Sub Pro Leadership have said that since no Consensus appears to exist on adopting a new Name Collision Framework, the Sub Pro WG is required to fall back to the 90-day Controlled Interruption practice used in the 2012 round,   However,  numerous public commenters filed comment on the Sub Pro Initial Report stating that Sub Pro should "defer to the SSAC".  I assume the Sub Pro Final Report will note the "deference to SSAC" but it appears possible that Leadership may not feel comfortable designating that as a Consensus opinion.  (I am sure Jeff and Rubens will advise when that discussion occurs – and may even send the proposed text of  the Final Report to the NCAP if we establish a way to work together.)
> 

I wouldn't qualify 2 as as numerous comments supporting deferring to SSAC. One cluster was IPC/USPS, the other was ALAC. When analysing comments, they are usually deduplicated to more accurately represent diversity.



Rubens

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ncap-discuss/attachments/20200206/46f22ea3/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 529 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ncap-discuss/attachments/20200206/46f22ea3/signature.asc>