[NCAP-Discuss] Additional comments on the comments to the Scarfone Draft

Rubens Kuhl rubensk at nic.br
Wed May 6 20:39:36 UTC 2020



> On 6 May 2020, at 17:10, Danny McPherson <danny at tcb.net> wrote:
> 
> On 2020-05-06 16:07, Rubens Kuhl wrote:
>>> Further, the most virulent types of attacks are never going to be reported.
>> This is a boogeyman type of argument that contradicts the other
>> requests for evidence.
> 
> Rubens,
> I'm talking about MiTM attacks exploiting collisions.  Victim's don't know they're happening - if you know where attackers are reporting them let me know please....
> 


Attackers don't do MiTM attacks just for proof of concept; they go ahead and actually do something like stealing money or information. Of those episodes, some would have noticed the crime, reported it to authorities, which then would trigger investigations and at same point people would know that it happened.

And yet, years after the delegations, nothing surfaced.


Rubens




-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 529 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ncap-discuss/attachments/20200506/94acdfff/signature-0001.asc>


More information about the NCAP-Discuss mailing list