[NCAP-Discuss] Additional comments on the comments to the Scarfone Draft

Rubens Kuhl rubensk at nic.br
Thu May 7 01:40:07 UTC 2020


> 
> It all stands on technical merit and I appreciate technical arguments - yours are not and comments like the above as well as your unwillingness to read any citations and lack of willingness and/or ability to grasp fundamentals remind me you’re just here to troll and I’m not going to feed it anymore.
> 

The argument I made is a technical one, about share of discovery protocols relying on _ and thus not prone to be exploited in the ICANN-governed ecosystem. By trying ad-hominem tactics of detracting technical knowledge just because someone disagrees with your positions, this makes the person I responding to the troll in all this.


Rubens



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 529 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ncap-discuss/attachments/20200506/34d5f8ca/signature.asc>


More information about the NCAP-Discuss mailing list