[NCAP-Discuss] [Ext] Re: An Approach to Measuring Name Collisions Using Online Advertisement

[Jeff Schmidt]

The observations in NCAP Study one pages 35 and 36 vis-à-vis reports are correct. Nothing else can be inferred given a microscopic sample size and Internet scale denominator. Certainly we can infer nothing about specific strings “having issues” (or not).

Jeff





________________________________
From: Thomas, Matthew <mthomas at verisign.com>
Sent: Thursday, June 9, 2022 11:27:25 AM
To: Jeff Schmidt <jschmidt at jasadvisors.com>
Cc: rubensk at nic.br <rubensk at nic.br>; ncap-discuss at icann.org <ncap-discuss at icann.org>
Subject: Re: Re: [NCAP-Discuss] [Ext] Re: An Approach to Measuring Name Collisions Using Online Advertisement

I have to disagree Jeff. No one had the collision reports from ICANN when the Interisle and JAS reports were written. So this is _new information. We now know what strings had issues and can retroactively look back at the Interisle and JAS reports to see where those documented collisions occurred.

Matt

> On Jun 9, 2022, at 9:47 AM, Jeff Schmidt <jschmidt at jasadvisors.com> wrote:
>
> Again, respectfully, this has all been done.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ncap-discuss/attachments/20220609/a269370e/attachment.html>