[NPOC-EC] Fwd: [SOAC-Leaders-ICANNMeeting-Planning] ICANN66 High Interest Topic on DNS Abuse - Deadline this Friday 2 August
Caleb Olumuyiwa Ogundele
muyiwacaleb at gmail.com
Fri Aug 2 16:47:26 UTC 2019
I agree with you on this
On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 2:46 PM Joan Kerr <joankerr at fbsc.org> wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
> This is in regards to the high interest planning topics, I think the DNS
> Abuse one is definitely what we want to support. This is a little outside
> of the planning session so far, but a good one.
>
> Let me know what you think.
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> From: Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson at afilias.info>
> Date: Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 1:05 PM
> Subject: Re: [SOAC-Leaders-ICANNMeeting-Planning] ICANN66 High Interest
> Topic on DNS Abuse - Deadline this Friday 2 August
> To: Mark Svancarek (CELA) <marksv at microsoft.com>, Steve DelBianco <
> sdelbianco at netchoice.org>, Manal Ismail <manal at tra.gov.eg>, Fabien
> Betremieux <fabien.betremieux at icann.org>, Cathrin Bauer-Bulst <
> Cathrin.BAUER-BULST at ec.europa.eu>, Kapin, Laureen <LKAPIN at ftc.gov>,
> Maureen Hilyard <maureen.hilyard at gmail.com>
> Cc: <soac-leaders-icannmeeting-planning at icann.org>
>
>
> All,
>
>
>
> I am a little concerned that we are now working outside of the meeting
> planning group. I think we should make sure that the planning group remains
> in the loop as we attempt to converge our ideas.
>
> That seems consistent with the plan that Mary circulated on July 17th.
>
>
>
> Looking over the thread, I propose we focus first on the desired outcomes
> which we seem to have good common ground on. I’d also like to highlight the
> requirement for a high-quality moderator / facilitator which seems critical.
>
>
>
> Do we agree on these?
>
> *Desired Outcomes from the Session*
>
> A common understanding of:
>
> · what is within ICANN’s mission and scope.
>
> · what is done by contracted parties to mitigate and respond to
> DNS abuse/security threats
>
> · what is the basis of the community concerns about DNS
> abuse/security threats
>
> · what are the residual issues that need to be dealt with
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Jonathan
>
>
>
> *From:* Mark Svancarek (CELA) [mailto:marksv at microsoft.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, August 1, 2019 12:41 AM
> *To:* jrobinson at afilias.info; 'Steve DelBianco' <sdelbianco at netchoice.org>;
> 'Manal Ismail' <manal at tra.gov.eg>; 'Fabien Betremieux' <
> fabien.betremieux at icann.org>; 'Cathrin Bauer-Bulst' <
> Cathrin.BAUER-BULST at ec.europa.eu>; 'Kapin, Laureen' <LKAPIN at ftc.gov>;
> 'Maureen Hilyard' <maureen.hilyard at gmail.com>
> *Cc:* 'Mary Wong' <mary.wong at icann.org>; 'Brian Winterfeldt'
> <Brian at Winterfeldt.law>; 'Robert Hoggarth' <robert.hoggarth at icann.org>;
> 'Graeme Bunton' <gbunton at tucows.com>; kdrazek at verisign.com
> *Subject:* RE: ICANN66 High Interest Topic on DNS Abuse - Deadline this
> Friday 2 August
>
>
>
> I understand the sensitivity of CPs to unfunded mandates, but I don’t see
> why we’d limit a HIT to ICANN’s remit, particularly if it resulted in only
> half a discussion. I didn’t think the DoH and DoT HIT discussions in
> Marrakech were limited to ICANN’s remit; sorry if I am confused about that.
>
>
>
> However, if the session were titled “ICANN’s role in mitigating DNS Abuse”
> then such a restriction would certainly make sense. AFAIK, that is not the
> intended title for the session.
>
>
>
> I request clarification from GAC regarding the intent of the HIT session,
> so that this can be resolved.
>
>
>
> /marksv
>
>
>
> *From:* Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson at afilias.info>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 31, 2019 2:51 PM
> *To:* 'Steve DelBianco' <sdelbianco at netchoice.org>; 'Manal Ismail' <
> manal at tra.gov.eg>; 'Fabien Betremieux' <fabien.betremieux at icann.org>;
> 'Cathrin Bauer-Bulst' <Cathrin.BAUER-BULST at ec.europa.eu>; 'Kapin,
> Laureen' <LKAPIN at ftc.gov>; 'Maureen Hilyard' <maureen.hilyard at gmail.com>
> *Cc:* 'Mary Wong' <mary.wong at icann.org>; 'Brian Winterfeldt' <
> Brian at Winterfeldt.law>; 'Robert Hoggarth' <robert.hoggarth at icann.org>;
> 'Graeme Bunton' <gbunton at tucows.com>; kdrazek at verisign.com; Mark
> Svancarek (CELA) <marksv at microsoft.com>
> *Subject:* RE: ICANN66 High Interest Topic on DNS Abuse - Deadline this
> Friday 2 August
>
>
>
> Thanks Steve,
>
>
>
> Your response is thoughtful and it was our original concept to work along
> the lines you suggest below.
>
>
>
> The concern we have with discussing the DNS Abuse / Security threats
> upfront is that we open up the topic to well beyond ICANN’s remit.
>
> Therefore, unless we appropriately constrain the problem within the
> logical limits (i.e. ICANN’s remit) we have an open ended discussion
> without relevant parameters.
>
>
>
> There is no intention to have an abstracted discussion about the bylaws
> but rather a targeted look at where the relevant boundaries are.
>
> Indeed, this is ideally not the substance of the discussion but a framing
> of the substantive discussion to follow within the relevant parameters.
>
>
>
> Can you see a way where we can ensure the discussion is appropriately
> framed at the outset in terms of the relevant limits of ICANN’s bylaws?
>
> If we can do this effectively and efficiently (hence the need for a
> well-qualified moderator), we can then move to the substantive discussion
> on community concerns.
>
>
>
> Jonathan
>
>
>
> *From:* Steve DelBianco [mailto:sdelbianco at netchoice.org
> <sdelbianco at netchoice.org>]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 31, 2019 8:53 PM
> *To:* jrobinson at afilias.info; 'Manal Ismail' <manal at tra.gov.eg>; 'Fabien
> Betremieux' <fabien.betremieux at icann.org>; 'Cathrin Bauer-Bulst' <
> Cathrin.BAUER-BULST at ec.europa.eu>; 'Kapin, Laureen' <LKAPIN at ftc.gov>;
> 'Maureen Hilyard' <maureen.hilyard at gmail.com>
> *Cc:* 'Mary Wong' <mary.wong at icann.org>; 'Brian Winterfeldt' <
> Brian at Winterfeldt.law>; 'Robert Hoggarth' <robert.hoggarth at icann.org>;
> 'Graeme Bunton' <gbunton at tucows.com>; kdrazek at verisign.com; Mark
> Svancarek <marksv at microsoft.com>
> *Subject:* Re: ICANN66 High Interest Topic on DNS Abuse - Deadline this
> Friday 2 August
>
>
>
> The contract parties have posed a relevant question in “ What is within
> ICANN’s mission and scope?”.
>
>
>
> However, we’ve seen what happens when we begin a discussion at ICANN with
> that question. It invariably occupies too much time as we argue about
> abstractions such as what issues affect the security, stability, and
> resiliency of the internet identifiers, and what obligations are in the
> bylaws section on reviews, etc.
>
>
>
> I think it would be better to re-arrange the order of your suggested
> format, so that we do it this way:
>
> 1. General discussion of community concerns about DNS abuse/security
> threats. This identifies actual abuse issues – not abstractions.
> 2. What is done by registries and registrars to mitigate and respond
> to DNS abuse/security threats? This allows contract parties to talk
> about what they do to protect their customers’ interests, their own
> interests, and what ICANN requires them to do.
>
>
>
> 1. What is within ICANN’s mission and scope to address? Now we
> assess whether ICANN’s remit permits asking the contract parties to do more
> than they already are.
>
>
>
> *From: *Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson at afilias.info>
> *Organization: *Afilias
> *Reply-To: *"jrobinson at afilias.info" <jrobinson at afilias.info>
> *Date: *Wednesday, July 31, 2019 at 1:43 PM
> *To: *Manal Ismail <manal at tra.gov.eg>, 'Fabien Betremieux' <
> fabien.betremieux at icann.org>, Steven DelBianco <sdelbianco at netchoice.org>,
> Cathrin Bauer-Bulst <Cathrin.BAUER-BULST at ec.europa.eu>, "'Kapin,
> Laureen'" <LKAPIN at ftc.gov>, 'Maureen Hilyard' <maureen.hilyard at gmail.com>
> *Cc: *Mary Wong <mary.wong at icann.org>, Brian Winterfeldt <
> Brian at Winterfeldt.law>, Rob Hoggarth <robert.hoggarth at icann.org>, Graeme
> Bunton <gbunton at tucows.com>, Keith Drazek <kdrazek at verisign.com>
> *Subject: *RE: ICANN66 High Interest Topic on DNS Abuse - Deadline this
> Friday 2 August
>
>
>
> Thank-you All,
>
>
>
> Please see below for the work product from the Contracted Parties. A key
> point for us is to establish a baseline in order to ensure a common
> understanding of the current position. Without a level set of information,
> we run the risk of having an under-informed community discussion.
>
>
>
> Look forward to further refinement. Looping Graeme and Keith in as well.
>
>
>
> Jonathan
>
>
>
> --
>
>
>
> *ICANN 66 Montreal*
>
> *Plenary Session Proposal*
>
> *Proposer Details*
>
> RySG
>
> *Session Description*
>
> This session approaches the currently "hot topic" of DNS Abuse by first
> looking at the key practical issues followed by a facilitated community
> discussion. First we'll take a focused look at ICANN's bylaws and remit and
> next, explore how registry and registrar operators mitigate and address DNS
> Abuse/security threats in that context. Third, the community will be
> invited to discuss issues arising and proposed solutions.
>
> *Session Rationale*
>
> Given the considerable interest surrounding DNS abuse within the
> community, we believe an effective discussion requires a good foundation
> and so will benefit from a common understanding of the following:
>
> ● What is within ICANN’s mission and scope to address;
>
> ● What is done by contracted parties to mitigate and address
> security threats; and
>
> ● What are the community concerns and what are the problems that
> need to be solved?
>
> Establishing a common foundation or baseline will allow for the most
> productive community-wide discussion about DNS abuse. A discussion that is
> focussed on addressing the problem rather than one which is focused on
> unspecified and /or potentially unsubstantiated claims of DNS abuse.
>
> *Desired Outcomes from the Session*
>
> A common understanding of:
>
> · what is within ICANN’s mission and scope.
>
> · what is done by contracted parties to mitigate and respond to
> DNS abuse/security threats
>
> · what is the basis of the community concerns about DNS
> abuse/security threats
>
> · what are the residual issues that need to be dealt with
>
> *Session format and participation*
>
> An independent and skilled moderator/facilitator will explore the
> following with representatives from the ICANN community and ICANN org:
>
> 1. What is within ICANN’s mission and scope to address?
> 2. What is done by registries and registrars to mitigate and respond
> to DNS abuse/security threats?
>
>
> 1. General discussion of community concerns about DNS abuse/security
> threats
>
> The meeting room layout should encourage interactive (“back and forth”)
> participation by a representative set of participants – as opposed to a
> small number of panelists facing the large room and then comments at the
> microphone.
>
>
>
> *From:* Manal Ismail [mailto:manal at tra.gov.eg <manal at tra.gov.eg>]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 31, 2019 3:54 PM
> *To:* Fabien Betremieux <fabien.betremieux at icann.org>; Steve DelBianco <
> sdelbianco at netchoice.org>; Cathrin Bauer-Bulst <
> Cathrin.BAUER-BULST at ec.europa.eu>; Kapin, Laureen <LKAPIN at ftc.gov>;
> Maureen Hilyard <maureen.hilyard at gmail.com>; 'jrobinson at afilias.info' <
> jrobinson at afilias.info>
> *Cc:* Mary Wong <mary.wong at icann.org>; Brian Winterfeldt <
> Brian at Winterfeldt.law>; Robert Hoggarth <robert.hoggarth at icann.org>
> *Subject:* RE: ICANN66 High Interest Topic on DNS Abuse - Deadline this
> Friday 2 August
>
>
>
> Thanks a million Fabien triggering this ..
>
> While awaiting Cathrin’s and Steve’s confirmation, allow me also to loop
> in Maureen and Jonathan, both cc’d to this email .. Maureen confirmed
> ALAC’s interest in the topic in order to provide end-users perspective and
> Jonathan stated that registries and registrars are working on input and
> will be sharing this input shortly ..
>
> Kind Regards
>
> --Manal
>
>
>
> *From:* Fabien Betremieux <fabien.betremieux at icann.org>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, July 30, 2019 10:58 PM
> *To:* Steve DelBianco <sdelbianco at netchoice.org>; Manal Ismail <
> manal at tra.gov.eg>; Cathrin Bauer-Bulst <Cathrin.BAUER-BULST at ec.europa.eu>;
> Kapin, Laureen <LKAPIN at ftc.gov>
> *Cc:* Mary Wong <mary.wong at icann.org>; Brian Winterfeldt <
> Brian at Winterfeldt.law>; Robert Hoggarth <robert.hoggarth at icann.org>
> *Subject:* ICANN66 High Interest Topic on DNS Abuse - Deadline this
> Friday 2 August
>
>
>
> Dear Steve, Dear Manal,
>
>
>
> Please allow me to loop in the co-chairs of the PSWG for potential
> contributions on this matter (noting that Laureen is not be available at
> this moment).
>
>
>
> My understanding is that the GAC PSWG may be interested in using this
> opportunity (an ICANN66 HIT Session) for driving progress on the
> implementation of relevant CCT-RT recommendations, some of which are
> currently pending “*I**CANN org facilitating community efforts to develop
> a definition of “abuse” to inform further action*”, and more generally to
> discuss actions the ICANN Community can already take (examples include
> leveraging existing definition of DNS Abuse, lessons to be learned from the
> DNS Infrastructure Abuse audits, sharing the DAAR data with contracted
> parties, negotiating amendments to Registry Agreements, etc.).
>
>
>
> To reflect the above, and subject to Cathrin’s review, may I suggest the
> following edits to the session description you suggested:
>
>
>
> *DNS Abuse takes a variety of forms, and thus mitigation of the abuse can
> be based in policy, in civil and criminal legal actions, in technology, or
> permutations of these. (EPDP Phase 2 is focusing on the policy
> considerations related to a subset of DNS Abuse, and will be discussed
> elsewhere.) This session will include discussion of how evolving legal and
> regulatory frameworks put DNS Abuse investigations and mitigations
> performed by 3rd parties at risk, how aware lawmakers and regulators of
> these risks, and how governments are working together to bring clarity to
> these issues, and actions the ICANN Community can take based on the
> experience it has accumulated on this matter over time and most recently
> through several processes including the CCT Review, the Domain Abuse
> Activity Reporting and the DNS Infrastructure Abuse Audits.*
>
>
> [135 words out of the 250 allowed]
>
>
>
> In terms of « Rationale/Desired Outcomes » (another required piece of
> information in the form to be submitted by this Friday), may I suggest for
> your consideration and editing as appropriate:
>
>
>
> *This session aims to identify measures that are being or should be taken
> to address ongoing issues in the identification and mitigation of DNS
> Abuse.*
>
>
>
> Best Regards
>
> Fabien
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *SOAC-Leaders-ICANNMeeting-Planning <
> soac-leaders-icannmeeting-planning-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Steve
> DelBianco <sdelbianco at netchoice.org>
> *Date: *Tuesday 30 July 2019 at 18:38
> *To: *Manal Ismail <manal at tra.gov.eg>, Mary Wong <mary.wong at icann.org>,
> Brian Winterfeldt <Brian at Winterfeldt.law>, "'
> soac-leaders-icannmeeting-planning at icann.org'" <
> soac-leaders-icannmeeting-planning at icann.org>
> *Subject: *Re: [SOAC-Leaders-ICANNMeeting-Planning] High Interest Topics
> for Cross Community Dialogue in ICANN66 in Montreal ..
>
>
>
> Thanks, Manal. The BC is keenly interested in the GAC’s DNS Abuse
> session, and suggests this text as a description:
>
>
>
> DNS Abuse takes a variety of forms, and thus mitigation of the abuse can
> be based in policy, in civil and criminal legal actions, in technology, or
> permutations of these. (EPDP Phase 2 is focusing on the policy
> considerations related to a subset of DNS Abuse, and will be discussed
> elsewhere.) This session will include discussion of how evolving legal and
> regulatory frameworks put DNS Abuse investigations and mitigations
> performed by 3rd parties at risk, how aware lawmakers and regulators of
> these risks, and how governments are working together to bring clarity to
> these issues.
>
>
>
> --Steve DelBianco
>
> BC Policy Coordinator
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* SOAC-Leaders-ICANNMeeting-Planning [
> mailto:soac-leaders-icannmeeting-planning-bounces at icann.org
> <soac-leaders-icannmeeting-planning-bounces at icann.org>] *On Behalf Of *Mary
> Wong
> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 17, 2019 11:51 PM
> *To:* Brian Winterfeldt; 'soac-leaders-icannmeeting-planning at icann.org'
> *Subject:* Re: [SOAC-Leaders-ICANNMeeting-Planning] High Interest Topics
> for Cross Community Dialogue in ICANN66 in Montreal ..
>
>
>
> Dear community leaders,
>
>
>
> Thank you all for the suggestions and feedback. If I may respond on the
> staff team’s behalf, we’ve discussed various ways in which we think we can
> best support your deliberations and planning. We would like to propose the
> following:
>
> - Community leaders may wish to immediately *socialize the three
> suggestions that have been put forward by the GAC* (below) with their
> community groups, to gauge the level of likely support and to determine
> whether any community group is already considering putting in a similar
> proposal.
> - Staff will create a *Google Doc/Sheet to record all plenary topic
> proposals* that are received between 22 July and 3 August. We’ll make
> sure that the format facilitates real-time feedback and collaborative
> discussion (e.g. the ability to comment, indicate support (or otherwise) as
> well as volunteer to co-organize a session, etc.). We will also prepopulate
> the document with the three suggestions from the GAC.
> - To the extent that one or more community groups support (or wish
> to put forward similar) proposals aligned with the GAC’s suggestions, we
> suggest that community leaders *encourage the group(s) to refrain
> from putting in a separate proposal*. Instead, the relevant
> community leader(s) should insert comments and support directly into the
> Google Doc/Sheet.
> - Staff will generate a brief *status report before 8 August*, to
> facilitate your determining whether a call to prioritize and decide on the
> plenary topics is necessary.
> - For example, if it becomes clear that (say) three proposals have
> widespread support, you may be able to agree on these without the need for
> additional discussion or calls.
>
>
>
> Please note that the form which Tanzanica sent out with her note (below)
> includes mandatory sections for the proposer to fill out regarding
> description, rationale and desired outcomes. As noted in the staff paper
> outlining this new planning process, we plan to *reject all topic
> proposals that do not include these details*.
>
>
>
> Finally, staff will create a separate *informational resource page*
> (perhaps a wiki space) for your and the community’s easy reference that
> will house the Production Calendar, Block Schedule (when that is ready),
> dates and records of production calls as well as links to other
> informational pages as may be needed.
>
>
>
> We hope these tools and the staff support we will provide to help manage
> them will facilitate a more effective and efficient planning process for
> the plenary sessions in Montreal. Should this approach meet with your
> satisfaction, we will look toward improving and refining them further for
> future use as part of the ICANN Meetings planning process.
>
>
>
> Thanks and cheers
>
> Tanzanica, Carlos & Mary
>
>
>
> *From: *SOAC-Leaders-ICANNMeeting-Planning <
> soac-leaders-icannmeeting-planning-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Brian
> Winterfeldt <Brian at Winterfeldt.law>
> *Date: *Wednesday, July 17, 2019 at 16:10
> *To: *"'soac-leaders-icannmeeting-planning at icann.org'" <
> soac-leaders-icannmeeting-planning at icann.org>
> *Subject: *Re: [SOAC-Leaders-ICANNMeeting-Planning] High Interest Topics
> for Cross Community Dialogue in ICANN66 in Montreal ..
>
>
>
> Dear Fellow SO and AC Leaders,
>
>
>
> I also agree it would be very helpful to understand the quantity of
> cross-collaboration slows and then ask our respective
> stakeholder/constituency groups to provide input that includes
> objectives/goals of each proposed session for ICANN66.
>
>
>
> Tanzanica, would you be able to help with this request?
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Brian
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
>
> <https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.winterfeldt.law%2F&data=02%7C01%7Cmarksv%40microsoft.com%7C00baf65b47714f3426a508d716013a57%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637002066853342620&sdata=6PXz1QPoY9fX5Fne4CKMUek6LJs%2BsFaa3KW13s50tx8%3D&reserved=0>
>
> *Brian J. Winterfeldt*
>
> Principal
>
> Winterfeldt IP Group
>
> 1200 17th St NW, Ste 501
>
> Washington, DC 20036
>
> brian at winterfeldt.law
>
> +1 202 903 4422
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
>
> From: SOAC-Leaders-ICANNMeeting-Planning [
> mailto:soac-leaders-icannmeeting-planning-bounces at icann.org
> <soac-leaders-icannmeeting-planning-bounces at icann.org>] On Behalf Of Fred
> Baker
>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2019 1:25 PM
>
> To: Rod Rasmussen <rod at rodrasmussen.com>
>
> Cc: soac-leaders-icannmeeting-planning at icann.org
>
> Subject: Re: [SOAC-Leaders-ICANNMeeting-Planning] High Interest Topics for
> Cross Community Dialogue in ICANN66 in Montreal ..
>
>
>
> Similar thoughts.
>
>
>
> What I might suggest is that we agree/are told how many
> cross-collaboration slots there are (it represents a hard upper bound), and
> invite people to (1) write a headline, (2) list a constituency, and (3)
> write a paragraph about the goals and agenda of their proposed meeting. We
> will likely still have to force-fit a few together, but we have the option
> of having people edit the paragraph and add themselves as constituents of a
> proposal. When it comes to choosing among them, meetings with the shortest
> list of constituents are an obvious place to start deleting or
> force-fitting.
>
>
>
> > On Jul 17, 2019, at 10:16 AM, Rod Rasmussen <rod at rodrasmussen.com>
> wrote:
>
> >
>
> > I like the idea of using a consolidated worksheet to drive this, as it
> also solves the timezone problems we face in trying to get everyone
> together.
>
> >
>
> > Cheers,
>
> >
>
> > Rod
>
> >
>
> >> On Jul 17, 2019, at 6:52 AM, Katrina Sataki <katrina at nic.lv> wrote:
>
> >>
>
> >> Hi All,
>
> >>
>
> >> While I fully support the idea to coordinate and discuss topic
> submission as proposed by Manal and supported by Jonathan, I have to note
> that we have tried this before, but for some reason it did not work well –
> we still ended up with similar session proposals being submitted and had to
> discuss the ways to consolidate them.
>
> >>
>
> >> I suspect that this good idea failed because we tried to do it over
> emails. Not everyone always has time to follow lengthy email exchanges and
> therefore inevitably something gets lost in the process. Emails are not
> designed to foster collaboration - we need another tool for that. Unless
> somebody can suggest a better way, maybe we can use Google doc to write
> down all the ideas, note support (or objection), add comments, etc.? And a
> wiki page to keep all the information/links in one place.
>
> >>
>
> >> Thank you, Tanzanica, for the timeline – it works for us!
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >> From: Manal Ismail [mailto:manal at tra.gov.eg <manal at tra.gov.eg>]
>
> >> Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2019 8:50 AM
>
> >> To: Tanzanica S. King <tanzanica.king at icann.org>;
>
> >> jrobinson at afilias.info; soac-leaders-icannmeeting-planning at icann.org
>
> >> Subject: RE: [SOAC-Leaders-ICANNMeeting-Planning] High Interest Topics
> for Cross Community Dialogue in ICANN66 in Montreal ..
>
> >>
>
> >> Many thanks Tanzanica .. Two quick points ..
>
> >>
>
> >> First, to clarify that I did not intend to summarize our discussion in
> Marrakech .. I meant to share only topics proposed by the GAC, highlighting
> feedback received from other constituencies on those topics ..
>
> >>
>
> >> Second, I proposed, and thought there was support, to share the topics
> first with a sentence or two on each in order to trigger initial comments,
> withdrawals and mergers, before we start completing a full form for each ..
> The intension is to shortlist our topics and allow early coordination and
> mergers of topics of common interest, including filling one form by all
> interested parts of the community and consequently avoiding confusion at
> the time of voting ..
>
> >> Is my understanding right?
>
> >>
>
> >> Kind Regards
>
> >> --Manal
>
> >>
>
> >> From: SOAC-Leaders-ICANNMeeting-Planning
>
> >> <soac-leaders-icannmeeting-planning-bounces at icann.org> On Behalf Of
>
> >> Tanzanica S. King
>
> >> Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2019 5:10 AM
>
> >> To: jrobinson at afilias.info;
>
> >> soac-leaders-icannmeeting-planning at icann.org
>
> >> Subject: Re: [SOAC-Leaders-ICANNMeeting-Planning] High Interest Topics
> for Cross Community Dialogue in ICANN66 in Montreal ..
>
> >>
>
> >> Dear Community Leaders:
>
> >>
>
> >> The revised production calendar for ICANN66 is attached. Please take a
> moment to review the schedule in full and make sure the deadlines fit with
> your expectations. Per your feedback in Marrakech, strict adherence to
> deadlines is a must. Therefore, as of 22 July 2019, these dates will be
> locked in and closely observed. If you have any deadline concerns, please
> let us know by the end of the week (20 July).
>
> >>
>
> >> The official submission period to propose plenary session topics is
> from 22 July - 2 August. However, the form is now open for anyone who wants
> to get a head start!
>
> >>
>
> >> Plenary Session Topic Proposal Form:
>
> >> https://icann.wufoo.com/forms/plenary-session-topic-proposal-form
> <https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ficann.wufoo.com%2Fforms%2Fplenary-session-topic-proposal-form&data=02%7C01%7Cmarksv%40microsoft.com%7C00baf65b47714f3426a508d716013a57%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637002066853352626&sdata=BNPjkQnf4wwCy76HyGMEnz%2FnIUNoSrLKoREDuXVMTlU%3D&reserved=0>
>
> >>
>
> >> Submission Deadline: 2 August 2019 @ 23:00 UTC
>
> >>
>
> >> We will share a link to the online report of proposals as soon as it
> becomes available. We’re also working to put together a collaborative wiki
> workspace for the group. I hope to have more details in the next day.
>
> >>
>
> >> As a reminder, Manal sent out a communication earlier this month with a
> very useful summary of the topics identified during the Kick-off in
> Marrakech. Details are copied below for your reference.
>
> >>
>
> >> Best regards,
>
> >>
>
> >> Tanzanica
>
> >>
>
> >> _______________________________________________
>
> >> Tanzanica S. King
>
> >> Sr. Manager, Meeting Strategy and Design ICANN
>
> >>
>
> >> Office +1 310 301 5800
>
> >> Mobile +1 310 995 3038
>
> >> www.icann.org
> <https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.icann.org&data=02%7C01%7Cmarksv%40microsoft.com%7C00baf65b47714f3426a508d716013a57%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637002066853362616&sdata=CDdRezrSc93TLjadZNNUi%2F3r2yM2vrYhn0Zxz8zcXf8%3D&reserved=0>
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >> From: SOAC-Leaders-ICANNMeeting-Planning
>
> >> <soac-leaders-icannmeeting-planning-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of
>
> >> Manal Ismail <manal at tra.gov.eg>
>
> >> Date: Monday , 1 July 2019 at 07:06
>
> >> To: SOAC-Leaders-ICANNMeeting-Planning
>
> >> <soac-leaders-icannmeeting-planning at icann.org>
>
> >> Subject: [SOAC-Leaders-ICANNMeeting-Planning] High Interest Topics for
> Cross Community Dialogue in ICANN66 in Montreal ..
>
> >>
>
> >> Dear All ..
>
> >>
>
> >> Hope you have all arrived safely by the time you read this ..
>
> >>
>
> >> Reference to our Montreal planning meeting in Marrakech, kindly note
> that, as flagged during the meeting, the GAC would be interested in
> co-organizing cross community sessions on the following topics:
>
> >>
>
> >> • DNS Abuse Mitigation (I note interest expressed by the RySG
> and
>
> >> SSAC during the meeting),
>
> >>
>
> >> • EPDP Phase 2 (I note interest expressed by GNSO during the
>
> >> meeting), and
>
> >>
>
> >> • Human Rights (I already know this request is coordinated
> with CCWP HR-CSR) and have received the below elaboration to help identify
> any further potential interest:
>
> >>
>
> >> The GAC Human Rights and International Law Working Group (GAC HRILWG)
> together with the Cross Community Working Party on ICANN’s Corporate and
> Social Responsibility to Respect Human Rights (CCWP HR-CSR) are working
> together to organize a cross-community session in Montreal which, regarding
> the HR Core Value, will:
>
> >>
>
> >> (1) offer a brief introduction to the subject of HR in connection
> with ICANNs mission;
>
> >> (2) briefly introduce the work so far in the community in this
> regard, including the development of the Core Value and the FoI, and the
> work that has been done on Human Right Impact Assessments in pursuance of
> the FOI (one already conducted and another intended by ICANN66);
>
> >> (3) focus on an open exchange on how ICANN as a community and its
> component parts (ICANN Org, SO/ACs) approach the implementation of this HR
> Core Value – including information on preparatory steps taken so far, inter
> alia, by CCWP and HRILWG;
>
> >> (4) consider follow-up as appropriate
>
> >>
>
> >> Hope you find this useful ..
>
> >>
>
> >> Kind Regards
>
> >> --Manal
>
> >>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SOAC-Leaders-ICANNMeeting-Planning mailing list
> SOAC-Leaders-ICANNMeeting-Planning at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/soac-leaders-icannmeeting-planning
>
> _______________________________________________
> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your
> personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance
> with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and
> the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can
> visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or
> configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or
> disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
>
>
> --
>
> Joan Kerr, Entrepreneur, Artist, Humanitarian
>
> _____________________________________
>
> Chair, Climate Smart Victory Garden Team
>
> Chair, ICANN, Not for Profit Operations Constituency
>
> Chair, IEEE Sustainable Agriculture Working Group
>
> Chair, Science for Peace, Climate Smart Victory Gardens
>
> Advisor, IEEE Humanitarian Initiatives Committee
>
> Advisor, Climate Smart Agriculture Youth Network, (CSAYN) Canada
>
> UN WSIS Award Recipient, for Content & Creativity
>
> Durham Region Recipient, Community Partnership Award
>
> Founder, Foundation for Building Sustainable Communities
>
> www.joankerr.ca, www.fbsc.org
>
> Skype: joankerr_fbsc
>
> 1-416-907-0783
> _______________________________________________
> NPOC-EC mailing list
> NPOC-EC at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/npoc-ec
>
> _______________________________________________
> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your
> personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance
> with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and
> the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can
> visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or
> configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or
> disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
--
*Ogundele Olumuyiwa Caleb*
*muyiwacaleb at gmail.com <muyiwacaleb at gmail.com>*
*234 - 8077377378*
*234 - 07030777969*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/npoc-ec/attachments/20190802/2e2d765e/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.png
Type: image/png
Size: 26135 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/npoc-ec/attachments/20190802/2e2d765e/image003-0001.png>
More information about the NPOC-EC
mailing list