[NPOC-EC] [NPOC-PC] Plan for capacity building

[Martin Pablo Silva Valent]

I think the key is to use the PDP as live example to learn on the process and work, so you start with one, then later we can go to the Subpro and see there how things work. In the end, you decide which topic/pdp is for you.

> On 31 Jan 2019, at 10:47, Joan Kerr <joankerr at FBSC.ORG> wrote:
> 
> Hi David, All
> 
> There is support for this idea, please let's put this into action and organize it, starting in Kobe.
> Thanks,
> 
>  <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>	Virus-free. www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> <x-msg://33/#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 2:22 PM David Cake <dave at davecake.net <mailto:dave at davecake.net>> wrote:
>         I’ve been working on a plan for capacity building for the NPOC policy committee. 
> 
>         I would like to propose a plan that rather than focus on specific skills, such as submitting comments, we focus on a specific policy issue for a few months, and revisiting it a few times over several meetings, including discussion at the start of the Kobe meeting, and then discussing what has happened around the issue again towards the end of the meeting. We can then look at the process of general analysis and advocacy, rather than specific sub-skills. At each of several successive meetings we can review how the policy process has gone, and then discuss how effective advocacy and policy work has taken. 
> 
>         The issue that I think would be appropriate is the Rights Protection Mechanism Review Working Group. This group is at an interesting point, it is working in sub-teams, and one of the sub-teams, the Trademark Data Review Sub-team, is co-chaired by Martin Silva Valent, who is of course both an active NPOC member and an NCSG Councillor. This gives us a valuable opportunity to have working group leadership explain the process to us, and Martin has indicated he would be enthusiastic. Unfortunately he will not be at the Kobe meeting, but we may also take advantage of that meeting to have NCSG (or other) colleagues explain some of the historical background and active issues. 
> 
>         I would like to hear PC feedback on this idea. 
> 
>         David
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NPOC-EC mailing list
> NPOC-EC at icann.org <mailto:NPOC-EC at icann.org>
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/npoc-ec <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/npoc-ec>
> 
> 
> -- 
> Joan Kerr,
> Entrepreneur, Artist, Humanitarian
> T: +1 (416) 907-0783
> Skype: joankerr_fbsc
> fbsc.org <http://fbsc.org/>, www.fbsc.eco
> Chair: Victory Garden Leadership Implementation Team
> Chair, Sustainable Agriculture, Global Humanitarian Technology Conference
> Chair: IEEE Smart Villages Project, Sustainable Agriculture Working Group
> Chair: ICANN Not for Profit Operational Concerns Constituency
> Recipient of the United Nations Civil Society Award (WSIS 2004)
> Recipient, Region of Durham Community Partnership Award
> Advisor, IEEE Humanitarian Initiatives Committee
> Advisor, Climate Smart Agriculture Youth Network, (CSAYN) Global Coordination Unit
> -- 
> PC mailing list
> PC at npoc.org
> http://npoc.org/mailman/listinfo/pc_npoc.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/npoc-ec/attachments/20190131/3cdd1661/attachment-0001.html>