[NPOC-EC] Fwd: [NCUC-DISCUSS] URGENT - Time sensitive What is your view on on the question of rebalancing the Nominating Committee (NomCom)

[Emmanuel Vitus]

Team what is our input to this? We have raised this more than anyone, now
it’s the time to put the request on paper.

Kind regards,
Emmanuel

---------- Message transféré ---------
De : Benjamin Akinmoyeje <benakin at gmail.com>
Date : lun. 26 juin 2023 à 19:57
Objet : [NCUC-DISCUSS] URGENT - Time sensitive What is your view on on the
question of rebalancing the Nominating Committee (NomCom)
À : NCUC-discuss <ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org>


Dear NCUC members,

Good day and I hope your week is going well.
Thank you for participating in the NCUC Readout session.  As discussed in
the meeting today, please share  your response to these questions to gather
our community views.

ICANN Board Chair Tripti Sinha is  requesting feedback from your respective
community groups on the question of rebalancing the Nominating Committee (
NomCom) by **30 June 2023**. As noted in the letter, the ICANN Board wishes
to engage with the community to understand the community’s views on this
topic. The Board is specifically seeking input on the following questions:

1. What does it mean to have a balanced NomCom at a point in time?
For example, what criteria would you apply to measure or assess whether the
NomCom is balanced? And further, how can one test whether or not the NomCom is
balanced?

2. Do you support the view that the current composition of the NomCom needs
to be rebalanced? Please explain why or why not.

3. How frequently does the balance need to be measured or assessed?

4. How do you suggest that the NomCom’s composition be rebalanced?

5. Who should conduct this work, and how should it be conducted?

6. How would your community group prioritize consideration of this issue
within your planning efforts?

Additional background on the work to date on this topic, including by the
NomCom Review Implementation Working Group that
was set up to implement the outcomes of the Second NomCom Review (see
https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/correspondence


<https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/correspondence> for each of the
letters sent to all 21 SOAC leaders). In addition, on 25 May 2023, the
Chair of the Board’s Organizational Effectiveness Committee, Katrina
Sataki, and members of ICANN org’s Reviews Support & Accountability team
gave a presentation to the GNSO Council that covered the present
structure of NomCom, a brief history of the rebalancing matter and
forthcoming actions. As such, you may find the presentation
<
https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/policy/2023/presentation/presentation-gnso-council-
nomcom-rebalancing-revised-25may23-en.pdf> and
the recording
<
https://icann.zoom.us/rec/share/7pSQ37mSB5wGz8-msQS2PDpzhQ6VdJQISm2SYmWKwfFMWFM_Z6FdMsFiipNyIV-E.J55mm5SBjoZJS9d9?startTime=1684990882000
> (from
00:14:10 - 00:31:38) helpful in discussing any planned feedback with
your members.
_______________________________________________
Ncuc-discuss mailing list
Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
-- 
Sent from iPhone. Excuse brevity and typos.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/npoc-ec/attachments/20230626/0cba57b5/attachment.html>