[RDS-WHOIS2-RT] Plenary Call #40: Action Items/Decisions Reached

[Jean-Baptiste Deroulez]

Dear review team members,

Following up on today’s plenary call #40, please find below the action items/decisions reached. We also attached the “recommendations prioritization” chart which was projected in Adobe Connect.
Status of report: ADOPTED.
On Executive Summary
Status: Adopted with one edit:

  *   Replace "privacy mechanisms" by "informal privacy/proxy mechanisms"
On WHOIS1 Rec #1 - Strategic Priority
Status: Adopted with following edits and recommendation priority

     *   Replace "significant concern" with "significant importance"
     *   Add footnote on policy
     *   Add "ICANN did not take any action to address".to address SP10 and tie to relevant section
     *   Agreement for R1.1 - 1.2 to be high priority
     *   Agreement for R1.3 to be medium priority
On WHOIS1 Rec #2 - Single WHOIS Policy
Status: Adopted with following edits:

     *   Improve readability (SP13)
     *   Lisa/Alan to draft paragraph to address Stephanie's comment SP14
     *   Sentence "We would expect the affirmed Temporary Specification will exist as a digital artefact and will be the new base for a single documented source of all things pertaining gTLD Registration Data (WHOIS)." will be removed, to address comment SP16.
     *   To address SP17: add footnote noting that there was one objection the Board did not notice in its acceptance. Use Accept instead of adopt.
     *   To address SP18: hopefully instead of likely
On WHOIS Rec #3 – Outreach
Status: Adopted with following edits:

     *   To address SP19, ICANN org to strike all from introductory sentence in all subgroups' sections
     *   To address SP20, strike phrase pertaining to educate them
     *   The first sentence should end "gTLD domains. The content should be revised..."
     *   Agreement for R3.1 (including two suggested edits) with medium priority
     *   Include after first sentence of the rationale for 3.2: this need was further supported by parts of the ICANN community
     *   Agreement for R3.2 to be high priority
On WHOIS1 Rec #4 – Compliance
Status: Adopted with following edits:

     *   Insert "contract negotiation or" after "in which case" in Feasibility
     *   Agreement for R4.1 and R4.2 to be high priority
On WHOIS Recs# 5-9 - Data Accuracy
Status: Adopted with following edit:

     *   Agreement to leave Priority as "To be determined"
     *   Agreement on rec.5.1
On WHOIS 1 Rec#10 - Privacy/Proxy Services
Status: Adopted with following edits:

     *   Adjust text to use 31 December 2019 and remove "implementation timeframes notwithstanding"
     *   Agreement for 10.1 and 10.2 to be low priority
On WHOIS1 Rec#11 - Common Interface
Status: Adopted with following edits:

     *   Agreement for 11.1 to be low priority
     *   Agreement for R11.2 to be high priority
On WHOIS1 Recs#12-14 – IDNs
Status: Adopted

     *   Agreement for R12.1 to be low priority
On WHOIS Recs #15-16
Status: Adopted

     *   Agreement for R15.1 to be medium priority
On Subgroup 2 Anything New
Status: Adopted
On Subgroup 3 Law Enforcement Needs
Status: Adopted

     *   Agreement on Rec.LE.1 & LE.2 with high priority
     *   leave recommendation LE.2 as is, adding "on a regular basis" at the end
     *   No objections
On Subgroup 4 Consumer Trust
Status: Adopted as is with no recommendations
On Subgroup 5: Safeguarding Registrant Data
Status: Adopted

     *   Agreement on SG.1 with Medium Priority
On Subgroup 6: ICANN Contractual Compliance
Status: Adopted

     *   CM.1 is accepted as is with priority "High"
     *   CM.2: delete comment and accept as written, with Medium Priority
     *   CM.3: agreed with priority set as "Low"
     *   CM.4: Agreement for recommendation with "Low" priority. Add a footnote
     *   CM5: Accepted. Low priority
On ICANN Bylaws:
Status: Adopted

     *   Rec.BY.1: Adopted with Medium priority.
Next steps
Action Item: ICANN org to complete all of the edits listed above.

  *   For any items the review team needs to discuss, review team members to send email with label REPORT URGENT.
  *   If further discussion is needed on a unforeseen item, meeting will be held on Tuesday.
Kind regards,
Jean-Baptiste Deroulez


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rds-whois2-rt/attachments/20180827/376eca2a/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/applefile
Size: 17114 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rds-whois2-rt/attachments/20180827/376eca2a/attachment-0001.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Recommendations Prioritization.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 35057 bytes
Desc: Recommendations Prioritization.pdf
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rds-whois2-rt/attachments/20180827/376eca2a/RecommendationsPrioritization-0001.pdf>