[registrars] Deletes task force
Larry Erlich
erlich at domainregistry.com
Mon Dec 1 20:49:53 UTC 2003
I agree that a deletion should be explicit and
the legacy auto renew should stand. I can't imagine
why existing systems needs to be revised to change
a practice that has been in place for several
years now.
Larry Erlich
http://www.DomainRegistry.com
Robert F. Connelly wrote:
>
> At 06:26 PM 12/1/03 +1100, Bruce Tonkin wrote:
>
> ie the second sentence needs to be read in the context of
> the first sentence which reads:
> At the conclusion of the registration period, failure by or
> on behalf of the Registered Name Holder to consent that the
> registration be renewed within the time specified in a
> second notice or reminder shall, in the absence of
> extenuating circumstances, result in cancellation of the
> registration by the end of the auto-renew grace period
> (although registrars may choose to cancel the name earlier).
>
> There is no intent to indicate that a registry would cancel
> a name prior to the completion of the grace period -
> otherwise it wouldn't be a grace period.
>
> Dear Bruce: That's how I read it, even though I truncated it in my
> question.
>
> We would not want to have a registrY delete *after* the grace period.
> Deletion should not be made without an explicit *deletion* command
> from the registrar. At present, as far as I know, there is no
> requirement for an explicit renewal. If we get paid by any means, we
> take the domain off registrar-hold and permit it to resolve.
>
> Prior to expiration, we accept credit card renewals and send an
> explicit renewal for one or more years automatically. If the
> registrant sends a bank transfer prior to expiration, we send the
> renewal command manually. If they pay during the grace period for one
> year, we ignore it and let the auto-renewal stand. If they renew for
> two to nine years, we manually extend the expiration date.
>
> If I have properly interpreted it, the TF report would allow (or
> encourage) a registry to delete *after* the grace period if they hear
> nothing from us, we want to have our voices heard in opposition to
> such an arbitrary act by a registrY.
>
> Regards, BobC, from Tokyo
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Larry Erlich - DomainRegistry.com, Inc.
215-244-6700 - FAX:215-244-6605 - Reply: erlich at DomainRegistry.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the registrars
mailing list