[registrars] Third Draft Standard form of authorisation for use by losing registrars after a transfer is initiated

[Rick Wesson]

Chuck,

I've been unclear.

   Account: A
       Domain 1:  Gaining Registrar X
       Domain 2: Gaining Registrar Y

I would like to send one note that is composed of all relivant information 
without being required to dump many simular messages to the same registrant.

I cannot provide you an as example that you requested, because one does not 
exits.

best,

-rick


On Wednesday 08 October 2003 12:35 pm, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
> Rick,
>
> Please provide me an example of a domain name where there is not a 1-1
> mapping between a registrant and a registrar, losing or gaining, within the
> transfer process.
>
> Chuck Gomes
> VeriSign Com Net Registry
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Alice's Registry Help Desk [mailto:support at alices-registry.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2003 10:47 AM
> > To: Bruce Tonkin; Tina Dam; Gomes, Chuck; ross at tucows.com;
> > Elana Broitman; Jeff.Neuman at NeuLevel.biz;
> > paul at internetters.co.uk; roessler at does-not-exist.org;
> > grant.forsyth at team.telstraclear.co.nz;
> > sricciardi at fibertel.com.ar; Karen Lentz; halloran at icann.org;
> > Ellen Sondheim
> > Cc: registrars at dnso.org
> > Subject: Re: [registrars] Third Draft Standard form of
> > authorisation for use by losing registrars after a transfer
> > is initiated
> >
> >
> >
> > Bruce,
> >
> > your note makes many assumptions one of which is that there is a
> > one to one maping between registrant and domain and a one to
> > one relationship
> > to the domain and the gaining registrar.
> >
> > If an account is moving their domains there will be many
> > domains related to
> > the account which might have several registrants and evern
> > more domains.
> >
> > I prefer a more flexable definition insted of a termplate.
> > Simply define all
> > the elements that are requireed in the note insted of a
> > template that must be
> > followed.
> >
> > An example requirement would simply list all the elemenst you
> > have within angle brackets <>
> >
> > -rick
> >
> > On Tuesday 07 October 2003 2:21 am, Bruce Tonkin wrote:
> > > Hello All,
> > >
> > > Below is an updated version.
> > >
> > > The changes include:
> > > - simplified message by removing details of the gaining registrar
> > > (lowers the burden on the losing registrar to collect this
> > > information)
> > >
> > > Further comments welcome.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Bruce
> >
> > **********************************************************************
> >
> > > **
> > > ******************
> > >
> > > An English version of this message is contained below.
> > >
> > > <Insert translation of English version in preferred language of the
> > > registrant if known>
> > >
> > > ENGLISH VERSION
> > >
> > > DOMAIN NAME TRANSFER
> > >
> > > Attention: <insert Registrant or Administrative Contact of
> >
> > Record as
> >
> > > listed in the WHOIS>
> > >
> > > Re: Transfer of <insert domain name>
> > >
> > > <insert name of losing registrar and/or name of reseller> received
> > > notification on <insert date of notification> that you have
> >
> > requested
> >
> > > a transfer to another domain name registrar.
> > >
> > > If you have authorised this transfer, you do not need to respond to
> > > this message.
> > >
> > > If you wish to cancel the transfer, please contact us
> > > <insert contact details> within <insert timeframe> days, or the
> > > transfer will proceed.
> > >
> > > [optional] or please go to our website within <insert
> >
> > timeframe> days,
> >
> > > <insert URL of confirmation webpage> to confirm or deny the
> >
> > transfer.
> >
> > > [Note: website to contain text as above, with the option to
> >
> > confirm or
> >
> > > deny the transfer.  This option may be presented first at
> >
> > the choice of
> >
> > > the losing registrar]