[registrars] RE: Election of RC Reps to the GNSO Council

[Rob Hall]

Actually, as Bob has so eloquently pointed out, posting to the list seems to 
not matter.

Our bylaws state that the nomination and second must be sent to the 
constituency secretary to be official.

I believe there is no desention that this occured.

Rob.

P.S.  And I won't even begin to bring up the fact that I bet the other 
nominations and seconds were not sent to the secretary, but rather just posted 
to the list <huge grin>. 



Quoting Elana Broitman <ebroitman at register.com>:

> Rick - it appears from John's post today that his email may have bounced.
> 
> Given that Bob had included John's note before the deadline cut off' we
> should count it and change the ballot to include Bob
> 
>  -----Original Message-----
> From: 	Alice's Registry Help Desk
> Sent:	Wed Oct 08 18:26:57 2003
> To:	Robert F. Connelly; Registrars Executive Committee; Registrars
> Constituency
> Subject:	Re: [registrars] RE: Election of RC Reps to the GNSO Council
> 
> Bob,
> 
> I don't doubt you recieved the second, if you could just point it out to me 
> on the registrars mailing list 
> see http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/registrars/
> 
> thanks,
> 
> -rick
> 
> On Wednesday 08 October 2003 3:15 pm, Robert F. Connelly wrote:
> > At 02:32 PM 10/5/03 -0400, John Wong wrote:
> >
> > [Dear Rick:  Here it is.  Regards, BobC]
> >
> > >I would like to second this nomination.
> > >
> > >John Wong
> > >
> > >Jean-Michel Becar wrote:
> > >>I would like to nominate Bob Connelly as the alternate representative.
> > >>
> > >>I've known Bob for more than 5 years now from the early time of that big
> > >>adventure that Domain Names are, so his experience, and his knowledge
> > >>will make him a very good alternate representative.
> 
> 
>